1.3.1
Castor XML is an XML data binding framework. Unlike the two main XML APIs, DOM (Document Object Model) and SAX (Simple API for XML) which deal with the structure of an XML document, Castor enables you to deal with the data defined in an XML document through an object model which represents that data.
Castor XML can marshal almost any "bean-like" Java Object to and from XML. In most cases the marshalling framework uses a set of ClassDescriptors and FieldDescriptors to describe how an Object should be marshalled and unmarshalled from XML.
For those not familiar with the terms "marshal" and "unmarshal", it's simply the act of converting a stream (sequence of bytes) of data to and from an Object. The act of "marshalling" consists of converting an Object to a stream, and "unmarshalling" from a stream to an Object.
The XML data binding framework, as it's name implies, is
responsible for doing the conversion between Java and XML.
The framework consists of two worker classes,
org/exolab/castor/xml/Marshaller
and
org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller
respectively, and a bootstrap class
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext
used for configuration of the XML data binding framework and
instantiation of the two worker objects.
Lets walk through a very simple example. Assume we have a
simple
Person
class as follows:
import java.util.Date; /** An simple person class */ public class Person implements java.io.Serializable { /** The name of the person */ private String name = null; /** The Date of birth */ private Date dob = null; /** Creates a Person with no name */ public Person() { super(); } /** Creates a Person with the given name */ public Person(String name) { this.name = name; } /** * @return date of birth of the person */ public Date getDateOfBirth() { return dob; } /** * @return name of the person */ public String getName() { return name; } /** * Sets the date of birth of the person * @param name the name of the person */ public void setDateOfBirth(Date dob) { this.dob = dob; } /** * Sets the name of the person * @param name the name of the person */ public void setName(String name) { this.name = name; } }
To (un-)marshal data to and from XML, Castor XML can be used in one of three modes:
introspection mode
mapping mode
descriptor mode (aka generation mode)
The following sections discuss each of these modes at a high level.
The introspection mode is the simplest mode to use from a user perspective, as it does not require any configuration from the user. As such, the user does not have to provide any mapping file(s), nor point Castor to any generated descriptor classes (as discussed in the 'descriptor mode' section).
In this mode, the user makes use of
static
methods on the
org.exolab.castor.xml.Marshaller
and
org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller
classes, providing all required data as parameters on
these method calls.
To marshal an instance of the person class you simply
call the
org.exolab.castor.xml.Marshaller
as follows:
// Create a new Person Person person = new Person("Ryan 'Mad Dog' Madden"); person.setDateOfBirth(new Date(1955, 8, 15)); // Create a File to marshal to writer = new FileWriter("test.xml"); // Marshal the person object Marshaller.marshal(person, writer);
This produces the XML shown in Example 1.1, “XML produced in introspection mode”
To unmarshal an instance of the person class from XML,
you simply call the
org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller
as follows:
// Create a Reader to the file to unmarshal from reader = new FileReader("test.xml"); // Marshal the person object Person person = (Person) Unmarshaller.unmarshal(Person.class, reader);
Marshalling and unmarshalling is basically that simple.
Note | |
---|---|
Note: The above example uses the
static
methods of the marshalling framework, and as such no
Marshaller and/or Unmarshaller instances need to be
created. A common mistake in this context when using a
mapping file
is to call the
org.exolab.castor.xml.Marshaller or
org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller
as in the above example. This won't work, as the mapping
will be ignored.
|
In introspection mode , Castor XML uses Java reflection to establish the binding between the Java classes (and their properties) and the XML, following a set of (default) naming rules. Whilst it is possible to change to a different set of naming rules, there's no way to override this (default) naming for individual artifacts. In such a case, a mapping file should be used.
In mapping mode , the user provides Castor XML with a user-defined mapping (in form of a mapping file) that allows the (partial) definition of a customized mapping between Java classes (and their properties) and XML.
When you are using a mapping file, create an instance of
the
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext
class and use the
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext.addMapping(Mapping)
method to provide Castor XML with one of more mapping
files.
To start using Castor XML for marshalling and/or
unmarshalling based upon your custom mapping, create
instances of
org.exolab.castor.xml.Marshaller
and
org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller
as needed using one of the following methods:
Table 1.1. Methods on XMLContext to create Un-/Marshaller objects
Method name | Description |
---|---|
Creates a Marshaller instance. | |
Creates a Unmarshaller instance. |
and call any of the non-static (un)marshal methods to trigger data binding in either way.
Below code shows a full example that demonstrates
unmarshalling a
Person
instance from XML using a
org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller
instance as obtained from an XMLContext previously
configured to your needs.
Example 1.2. Unmarshalling from XML using a mapping
import org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext; import org.exolab.castor.mapping.Mapping; import org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller; // Load Mapping Mapping mapping = new Mapping(); mapping.loadMapping("mapping.xml"); // initialize and configure XMLContext XMLContext context = new XMLContext(); context.addMapping(mapping); // Create a Reader to the file to unmarshal from reader = new FileReader("test.xml"); // Create a new Unmarshaller Unmarshaller unmarshaller = context.createUnmarshaller(); unmarshaller.setClass(Person.class); // Unmarshal the person object Person person = (Person) unmarshaller.unmarshal(reader);
To marshal the very same
Person
instance to XML using a
org.exolab.castor.xml.Marshaller
obtained from the
same
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext
,
use code as follows:
Example 1.3. Marshalling to XML using a mapping
import org.exolab.castor.xml.Marshaller; // create a Writer to the file to marshal to Writer writer = new FileWriter("out.xml"); // create a new Marshaller Marshaller marshaller = context.createMarshaller(); marshaller.setWriter(writer); // marshal the person object marshaller.marshal(person);
Please have a look at XML Mapping for a detailed discussion of the mapping file and its structure.
For more information on how to effectively deal with loading mapping file(s) especially in multi-threaded environments, please check the best practice section.
With Castor 1.1.2, the
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext
class has been added to the Castor marshalling framework.
This new class provides a bootstrap mechanism for Castor
XML, and allows easy (and efficient) instantiation of
org.exolab.castor.xml.Marshaller
and
org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller
instances as needed.
As shown above, the
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext
class offers various factory methods to obtain a new
org.exolab.castor.xml.Marshaller
,
org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller
.
When you need more than one
org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller
instance in your application, please call
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext.createUnmarshaller()
as required. As all
Unmarshaller
instances are created from the very same
XMLContext
instance, overhead will be minimal. Please note, though,
that use of one
Unmarshaller
instance is not thread-safe.
Castor can marshal "almost" any arbitrary Object to and from XML. When descriptors are not available for a specfic Class, the marshalling framework uses reflection to gain information about the object.
Note | |
---|---|
Actually an in memory set of descriptors are created for the object and we will soon have a way for saving these descriptors as Java source, so that they may be modified and compiled with little effort. |
If a set of descriptors exist for the classes, then Castor will use those to gain information about how to handle the marshalling. See Section 1.1.6, “Class Descriptors” for more information.
There is one main restrictions to marshalling objects. These classes must have have a public default constructor (ie. a constructor with no arguments) and adequete "getter" and "setter" methods to be properly be marshalled and unmarshalled.
The example illustrated in the previous section Section 1.1.2, “Castor XML - The XML data binding framework” demonstrates how to use the framework with existing classes.
Class descriptors provide the "Castor Framework" with necessary information so that the Class can be marshalled properly. The class descriptors can be shared between the JDO and XML frameworks.
Class descriptors contain a set of ???
XML Class descriptors provide the marshalling framework with
the information it needs about a class in order to be
marshalled to and from XML. The XMLClassDescriptor
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLClassDescriptor
.
XML Class Descriptors are created in four main ways. Two of these are basically run-time, and the other two are compile time.
To use "compile-time" class descriptors, one can
either implement the
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLClassDescriptor
interface for each class which needs to be
"described", or have the
Source Code Generator
create the proper descriptors.
The main advantage of compile-time descriptors is that they are faster than the run-time approach.
To use "run-time" class descriptors, one can either simply let Castor introspect the classes, a mapping file can be provided, or a combination of both "default introspection" and a specified mapping file may be used.
For "default introspection" to work the class being introspected must have adequete setter/getter methods for each field of the class that should be marshalled and unmarshalled. If no getter/setter methods exist, Castor can handle direct field access to public fields. It does not do both at the same time. So if the respective class has any getter/setter methods at all, then no direct field access will take place.
There is nothing to do to enable "default introspection". If a descriptor cannot be found for a class, introspection occurs automatically.
Some behavior of the introspector may be controlled by setting the appropriate properties in the castor.properties file. Such behavior consists of changing the naming conventions, and whether primitive types are treated as attributes or elements. See castor.properties file for more information.
A mapping file may also be used to "describe" the
classes which are to be marshalled. The mapping is
loaded before any marshalling/unmarshalling takes
place. See
org.exolab.castor.mapping.Mapping
The main advantage of run-time descriptors is that it takes very little effort to get something working.
Castor XML mapping is a way to simplify the binding of java classes to XML document. It allows to transform the data contained in a java object model into/from an XML document.
Although it is possible to rely on Castor's default behavior to marshal and unmarshal Java objects into an XML document, it might be necessary to have more control over this behavior. For example, if a Java object model already exists, Castor XML Mapping can be used as a bridge between the XML document and that Java object model.
Castor allows one to specify some of its marshalling/unmarshalling behavior using a mapping file. This file gives explicit information to Castor on how a given XML document and a given set of Java objects relate to each other.
A Castor mapping file is a good way to dissociate the changes in the structure of a Java object model from the changes in the corresponding XML document format.
The mapping information is specified by an XML document. This document is written from the point of view of the Java object and describes how the properties of the object have to be translated into XML. One constraint for the mapping file is that Castor should be able to infer unambiguously from it how a given XML element/attribute has to be translated into the object model during unmarshalling.
The mapping file describes for each object how each of its fields have to be mapped into XML. A field is an abstraction for a property of an object. It can correspond directly to a public class variable or indirectly to a property via some accessor methods (setters and getters).
It is possible to use the mapping and Castor default behavior in conjunction: when Castor has to handle an object or an XML data but can't find information about it in the mapping file, it will rely on its default behavior. Castor will use the Java Reflection API to introspect the Java objects to determine what to do.
Note: Castor can't handle all possible mappings. In some complex cases, it may be necessary to rely on an XSL transformation in conjunction with Castor to adapt the XML document to a more friendly format.
For Castor, a Java class has to map into an XML element. When Castor marshals an object, it will:
use the mapping information, if any, to find the name of the element to create
or
by default, create a name using the name of the class
It will then use the fields information from the mapping file to determine how a given property of the object has to be translated into one and only one of the following:
an attribute
an element
text content
nothing, as we can choose to ignore a particular field
This process will be recursive: if Castor finds a property that has a class type specified elsewhere in the mapping file, it will use this information to marshal the object.
By default, if Castor finds no information for a given class in the mapping file, it will introspect the class and apply a set of default rules to guess the fields and marshal them. The default rules are as follows:
All primitive types, including the primitive type wrappers (Boolean, Short, etc...) are marshalled as attributes.
All other objects are marshalled as elements with either text content or element content.
When Castor finds an element while unmarshalling a document, it will try to use the mapping information to determine which object to instantiate. If no mapping information is present, Castor will use the name of the element to try to guess the name of a class to instantiate (for example, for an element named 'test-element', Castor will try to instantiate a class named 'TestElement' if no information is given in the mapping file). Castor will then use the field information of the mapping file to handle the content of the element.
If the class is not described in the mapping file, Castor will instrospect the class using the Java Reflection API to determine if there is any function of the form getXxxYyy()/setXxxYyy(<type> x). This accessor will be associated with XML element/attribute named 'xxx-yyy'. In the future, we will provide a way to override this default behavior.
Castor will introspect object variables and use direct access _only_ if no get/set methods have been found in the class. In this case, Castor will look for public variables of the form:
public <type> xxxYYY;
and expect an element/attribute named 'xxx-yyy'. The only handled collections for <type> are java.lang.Vector and array. (up to version 0.8.10)
For primitive <type>, Castor will look for an attribute first and then an element. If <type> is not a primitive type, Castor will look for an element first and then an attribute.
The following sections define the syntax for each of the mapping file artefacts and their semantical meaning.
This section defines a small domain model that will be referenced by
various mapping file (fragments/samples) in the following sections. The model consists
of two two classes Order
and OrderItem
, where an order
holds a list of order items.
public class Order { private List orderItems; private String orderNumber; public List getOrderItems() { return orderItems; } public void setOrderItems(List orderItems) { this.orderItems = orderItems; } public String getOrderNumber() { return orderNumber; } public void setOrderNumber(String orderNumber) { this.orderNumber = orderNumber; } } public class OrderItem { private String id; private Integer orderQuantity; public String getId() { return id; } public void setId(String id) { this.id = id; } public Integer getOrderQuantity() { return orderQuantity; } public void setOrderQuantity(Integer orderQuantity) { this.orderQuantity = orderQuantity; } }
As shown above in bold, the Order
instance has a (private) field 'orderItems'
to hold a collection of OrderItem
instances. This field is publically exposed
by corresponding getter and setter methods.
<!ELEMENT mapping ( description?, include*, field-handler*, class*, key-generator* )>
The <mapping> element is the root element of a mapping file. It contains:
an optional description
zero or more <include> which facilitates reusing mapping files
zero of more <field-handler> defining custom, configurable field handlers
zero or more <class> descriptions: one for each class we intend to give mapping information
zero or more <key-generator>: not used for XML mapping
A mapping file look like this:
<?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE mapping PUBLIC "-//EXOLAB/Castor Mapping DTD Version 1.0//EN" castor.org "http://castor.org/mapping.dtd"> <mapping> <description>Description of the mapping</description> <include href="other_mapping_file.xml"/> <!-- mapping for class 'A' --> <class name="A"> ......... </class> <!-- mapping for class 'B' --> <class name="B"> ......... </class> </mapping>
<!ELEMENT class ( description?, cache-type?, map-to?, field+ )> <!ATTLIST class name ID #REQUIRED extends IDREF #IMPLIED depends IDREF #IMPLIED auto-complete ( true |false ) "false" identity CDATA #IMPLIED access ( read-only | shared | exclusive | db-locked ) "shared" key-generator IDREF #IMPLIED >
The <class>
element contains all the information used to
map a Java class into an XML document. The content of <class>
is mainly used to describe the fields that will be mapped.
Table 1.2. Description of the attributes
Name | Description |
---|---|
name | The fuly-qualified name of the Java class that we want to map to. |
extends | The fully qualified name of a parent class. This attribute should be used only if this class extends another class for which a class mapping is provided. It should not be used if there's no class maping for the extended class. |
depends | Used with Castor JDO only; for more information on this field, please see the JDO documentation. |
auto-complete | If true, the class will be introspected to determine its field and the fields specified in the mapping file will be used to overide the fields found during the introspection. |
identity | Used with Castor JDO only; for more information on this field, please see see the JDO documentation. |
access | Used with Castor JDO only; for more information on this field, please see see the JDO documentation. |
key-generator | Used with Castor JDO only; for more information on this field, please see see the JDO documentation. |
The auto-complete attributes is interesting as it allow a fine degree of control of the introspector: it is possible to specifiy only the fields whose Castor default behavior does not suite our needs. These feature should simplify the handling of complexe class containing many fields. Please see below for an example usage of this attribute.
Table 1.3. Description of the content
Name | Description |
---|---|
description | An optional description. |
cache-type | Used with Castor JDO only; for more information on this field, please see see the JDO documentation. |
map-to | Used if the name of the element is not the name of the class. By default, Castor will infer the name of the element to be mapped from the name of the class: a Java class named 'XxxYyy' will be transformed in 'xxx-yyy'. If you don't want Castor to generate the name, you need to use <map-to> to specify the name you want to use. <map-to> is only used for the root element. |
field | Zero or more <field> elements, which are used to describe the properties of the Java class being mapped. |
The following mapping fragment defines a class mapping for the OrderItem
class:
<class name="mypackage.OrderItem> <map-to xml="item"/> <field name="id" type="string"> <bind-xml name="identity" node="attribute"/> </field> </field name="orderQuantity" type="integer"> <bind-xml name="quantity" node="element"/> </field> </class>
When marshalling an OrderItem
instance, this yields the
following XML:
<?xml version="1.0" ?> <item identity="12"> <quantity>100</quantity> </item>
The following mapping fragment defines a class mapping for the same
class, where for all properties but id
introspection should
be used; the use of the auto-complete
attribute instructs Castor XML
to use introspection for all attributes other than 'id'
, where
the given field mapping will be used.
<class name="mypackage.OrderItem auto-complete="true"> <map-to xml="item"/> <field name="id" type="string"> <bind-xml name="identity" node="attribute"/> </field> </class>
When marshalling the very same OrderItem
instance, this yields the
following XML:
<?xml version="1.0" ?> <item identity="12"> <order-quantity>100</order-quantity> </item>
By removing the <map-to> element from above class mapping, ...
<class name="mypackage.OrderItem auto-complete="true"> <field name="id" type="string"> <bind-xml name="identity" node="attribute"/> </field> </class>
... Castor will use introspection to infer the element name from the Java
class name (OrderItem
), applying a default naming convention scheme.
When marshalling the very same OrderItem
instance, this yields the
following XML:
<?xml version="1.0" ?> <order-item identity="12"> <order-quantity>100</order-quantity> </order-item>
<!ELEMENT map-to EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST map-to
table NMTOKEN #IMPLIED
xml NMTOKEN #IMPLIED
ns-uri NMTOKEN #IMPLIED
ns-prefix NMTOKEN #IMPLIED
ldap-dn NMTOKEN #IMPLIED
element-definition (true|false) "false" NEW as of 1.0M3
ldap-oc NMTOKEN #IMPLIED>
<map-to>
is used to specify the name of the element that should
be associated with the given class. <map-to>
is only used for
the root class. If this information is not present, Castor will:
for marshalling, infer the name of the element to be mapped from the name of the class: a Java class named 'XxxYyy' will be transformed into 'xxx-yyy'.
for unmarshalling, infer the name of the class from the name of the element: for an element named 'test-element' Castor will try to use a class named 'TestElement'
Please note that it is possible to change the naming scheme used by Castor
to translate between the XML name and the Java class name in the
castor.properties
file.
Table 1.4. Description of attributes
xml | Name of the element that the class is associated to. |
ns-uri | Namespace URI |
ns-prefix | Desired namespace |
element-definition | True if the descriptor as created from a schema definition that
was of type element (as opposed to a <complexType> definition). This
only is useful in the context of source code generation. |
ldap-dn | Not used for Castor XML |
ldap-oc | Not used for Castor XML |
The following mapping fragment defines a <map-to element for the
OrderItem
class, manually setting the element name to a value
of 'item'
.
<class name="myPackage.OrderItem"> ... <map-to xml="item" /> ... </class>
The following mapping fragment instructs Castor to assign a namespace URI of
http://castor.org/sample/mapping/
to the <item> element,
and use a namespace prefix of 'castor'
during un-/marshalling.
<class name="myPackage.OrderItem"> ... <map-to xml="item" ns-uri="http://castor.org/sample/mapping/" ns-prefix="castor"/> ... </class>
When marshalling an OrderItem
instance, this will yield the
following XML:
<?xml version="1.0" ?> <castor:order-item xmlns:castor="http://castor.org/sample/mapping/" identity="12"> <castor:order-quantity>100</castor:order-quantity> </castor:order-item>
<!ELEMENT field ( description?, sql?, bind-xml?, ldap? )> <!ATTLIST field name NMTOKEN #REQUIRED type NMTOKEN #IMPLIED handler NMTOKEN #IMPLIED required ( true | false ) "false" direct ( true | false ) "false" lazy ( true | false ) "false" transient ( true | false ) "false" nillable ( true | false ) "false" container ( true | false ) "false" get-method NMTOKEN #IMPLIED set-method NMTOKEN #IMPLIED create-method NMTOKEN #IMPLIED collection ( array | vector | hashtable | collection | set | map ) #IMPLIED>
<field>
is used to describe a property of a Java object
we want to marshal/unmarshal. It gives:
its identity ('name')
its type (infered from 'type' and 'collection')
its access method (infered from 'direct', 'get-method', 'set-method')
From this information, Castor is able to access a given property in the Java class.
In order to determine the signature that Castor expects, there are two easy rules to apply.
1. Determine <type>.
If there is no 'collection' attribute, the <type> is just the Java type specified in <type_attribute> (the value of the 'type' attribute in the XML document). The value of <type_attribute> can be a fully qualified Java object like 'java.lang.String' or one of the allowed short name:
Table 1.5. Type shortnames
short name | Primitive type? | Java Class |
---|---|---|
other | N | java.lang.Object |
string | N | java.lang.String |
integer | Y | java.lang.Integer.TYPE |
long | Y | java.lang.Long.TYPE |
boolean | Y | java.lang.Boolean.TYPE |
double | Y | java.lang.Double.TYPE |
float | Y | java.lang.Float.TYPE |
big-decimal | N | java.math.BigDecimal |
byte | Y | java.lang.Byte.TYPE |
date | N | java.util.Date |
short | Y | java.lang.Short.TYPE |
char | Y | java.lang.Character.TYPE |
bytes | N | byte[] |
chars | N | char[] |
strings | N | String[] |
locale | N | java.util.Locale |
Castor will try to cast the data in the XML file in the proper Java type.
If there is a collection attribute , you can use the following table:
Table 1.6. Type implementations
name | <type> | default implementation |
---|---|---|
array | <type_attribute>[] | <type_attribute>[] |
arraylist | java.util.List | java.util.Arraylist |
vector | java.util.Vector | java.util.Vector |
hashtable | java.util.Hashtable | java.util.Hashtable |
collection | java.util.Collection | java.util.Arraylist |
set | java.util.Set | java.util.Hashset |
map | java.util.Map | java.util.Hashmap |
sortedset | java.util.SortedSet | java.util.TreeSet |
The type of the object inside the collection is <type_attribute>. The 'default implementation' is the type used if the object holding the collection is found to be null and need to be instantiated.
For hashtable and maps (since 0.9.5.3), Castor will save both key and values. When marshalling output <key> and <value> elements. These names can be controlled by using a top-level or nested class mapping for the org.exolab.castor.mapping.MapItem class.
Note: for backward compatibility with prior versions of Castor, the saveMapKeys property can be set to false in the castor.properties file.
For versions prior to 0.9.5.3, hashtable and maps, Castor will save only the value during marshalling and during unmarshalling will add a map entry using the object as both the key and value, e.g. map.put(object, object).
It is necessary to use a collection when the content model of the element expects more than one element of the specified type.
Determine the signature of the function
If 'direct' is set to true, Castor expects to find a class variable with the given signature:
public <type> <name>;
If 'direct' is set to false or omitted, Castor will access the property though accessor methods. Castor determines the signature of the accessors as follow: If the 'get-method' or 'set-method' attributes are supplied, it will try to find a function with the following signature:
public <type> <get-method>();
or
public void <set-method>(<type> value);
If 'get-method' and 'set-method' attributes are not provided, Castor will try to find the following function:
public <type> get<capitalized-name>();
or
public void set<capitalized-name>(<type> value);
<capitalized-name> means that Castor takes the <name> attribute and put its first letter in uppercase without modifying the other letters.
The content of <field> will contain the information on how to map this given field to SQL, XML, ...
Exceptions concerning collection fields:
The default is to treat the 'get-method' as a simple getter returning the collection field, and the 'set-method' as a simple getter used to set a new instance on the collection field.
Table 1.7. Collection field access
Parameter | Description |
---|---|
'get-method' |
If a 'get-method' is provided for a collection field, Castor - in adition to the default behaviour described above - will deviate from the standard case for the following special prefixes:
public Iterator iterate...();
A 'get-method' starting with the
prefix '
public Enumeration enum...();
A 'get-method' starting with '
|
'set-method' |
If 'set-method' is provided for a collection field, Castor - in addition to the default behaviour described above - will accept an 'add' prefix and expect the following signature: public void add...(<type> value); This method is called for each collection element while unmarshalling. |
Table 1.8. Description of the attributes
Name | Description |
---|---|
name | The field 'name' is required even if no such field exists in the class. If 'direct' access is used, 'name' should be the name of a public instance member in the object to be mapped (the field must be public, not static and not transient). If no direct access and no 'get-/set-method' is specified, this name will be used to infer the name of the accessors methods. |
type | The Java type of the field. It is used to access the field. Castor will use this information to cast the XML information (like string into integer). It is also used to define the signature of the accessor methods. If a collection is specified, this is used to specify the type of the objects held by the collection. See description above for more details. |
required | A field can be optional or required. |
nillable | A field can be of content 'nil '. |
transient | If true, this field will be ignored during the marshalling. This is usefull when used together with the auto-complete="true" option. |
direct | If true, Castor will expect a public variable in the containing class and will access it directly (for both reading and writing). |
container | Indicates whether the field should be treated as a container, i.e. only it's fields should be persisted, but not the containing class itself. In this case, the container attribute should be set to true (supported in Castor XML only). |
collection | If a parent expects more than one occurrence of one of its element, it is necessary to specify which collection Castor will use to handle them. The type specified is used to define the type of the content inside the collection. |
get-method | Optional name of the 'get method' Castor should use. If this attribute is not set and the set-method attribute is not set, then Castor will try to infer the name of this method with the algorithm described above. |
set-method | Optional name of the 'set method' Castor should use. If this attribute is not set and the get-method attribute is not set, then Castor will try to infer the name of this method with the algorithm described above. |
create-method | Optionally defines a factory method for the instantiation of a FieldHandler |
handler | If present, specifies one of the following:
|
In the case of XML mapping, the content of a field element should be one and only one <bind-xml> element describing how this given field will be mapped into the XML document.
Starting with release 0.9.5, for attribute
mapped fields, support has been added to map a constructor field using
the set-method
attribute.
To specify that a field (mapped to an attribute) should be used as a constructor
argument during object initialization, please specify a set-method
attribute on the
<field>
mapping and use "%X" as the value of the
set-method
attribute, where X
is a positive integer number, e.g. %1
or
%21
.
For example:
<field name="foo" set-method="%1" get-method="getFoo" type="string"> <bind-xml node="attribute"/> </field>
Note that because the set-method
is specified, the get-method
also
must be specified.
Tip: the XML HOW-TO section has a HOW-TO document for mapping constructor arguments, incl. a fully working mapping.
The following mapping fragment defines a <field>
element for the
member
property of the org.some.package.Root
class,
specifying a custom org.exolab.castor.mapping.FieldHandler
implementation.
<class name="org.some.package.Root"> <field name="member" type="string" handler="org.some.package.CustomFieldHandlerImpl"/> </class>
The same custom field handler as in the previous sample can be defined with a separate configurable <field-handler> definition, where additional configuration can be provided.
<field-handler name="myHandler" class="org.some.package.CustomFieldHandlerImpl"> <param name="date-format" value="yyyyMMddHHmmss"/> </field-handler>
and subsequently be referred to by its name as shown in the following field mapping:
<class name="org.some.package.Root"> <field name="member" type="string" handler="myHandler"/> </class>
Assume you have a class mapping for a class Order
which defines -
amongst others - a field mapping as follows, where the field item
refers to an instance of a class Item
.
<class name="some.example.Order"> ... <field name="item" type="some.example.Item" > <bind-xml> name="item" node="element" /> </field> ... </class> <class name="some.example.Item"> <field name="id" type="long" /> <field name="description" type="string" /> </class>
Marshalling an instance of Order
would produce XML as follows:
<order> ... <item> <id>100</id> <description>...</description> </item> </order>
If you do not want the Item
instance to be marshalled,
but only its fields, change the field mapping for the item
member to be as follows:
<field name="item" type="some.example.Item" container="false" > <bind-xml> name="item" node="element" /> </field>
The resulting XML would look as follows:
<order> ... <id>100</id> <description>...</description> </order>
<!ELEMENT bind-xml (class?, property*)> <!ATTLIST bind-xml name NMTOKEN #IMPLIED type NMTOKEN #IMPLIED location CDATA #IMPLIED matches NMTOKENS #IMPLIED QName-prefix NMTOKEN #IMPLIED reference ( true | false ) "false" node ( attribute | element | text ) #IMPLIED auto-naming ( deriveByClass | deriveByField ) #IMPLIED transient ( true | false ) "false">
Table 1.9. Description of the attributes
name | The name of the element or attribute.
| |||
auto-naming | If no name is specified, this attribute controls how castor will automatically create a name for the field. Normally, the name is created using the field name, however many times it is necessary to create the name by using the class type instead (such as heterogenenous collections). | |||
type | XML Schema type (of the value of this field) that requires specific handling in the Castor Marshalling Framework (such as 'QName' for instance). | |||
location (since 0.9.4.4) | Allows the user to specify the "sub-path" for which the value should be marshalled to and from. This is useful for "wrapping" values in elements or for mapping values that appear on sub-elements to the current "element" represented by the class mapping. For more information, see the Location attribute below. | |||
QName-prefix | When the field represents a QName value, a prefix can be provided that is used when marshalling value of type QName. More information on the use of 'QName-prefix' can be found in the SourceGenerator Documentation | |||
reference | Indicates if this field has to be treated as a reference by the
unmarshaller. In order to work properly, you must specify the node
type to 'attribute' for both the 'id' and the 'reference'. In
newer versions of Castor, 'element' node for reference is allowed.
Remember to make sure that an identity field is specified
on the <class> mapping for the object type being
referenced so that Castor knows what the object's identity is. | |||
matches | Allows overriding the matches rules for the name of the element. It is a standard regular expression and will be used instead of the 'name' field. A '*' will match any xml name, however it will only be matched if no other field exists that matches the xml name. | |||
node | Indicates if the name corresponds to an attribute, an element, or text content. By default, primitive types are assumed to be an attribute, otherwise the node is assumed to be an elemen | |||
transient | Allows for making this field transient for XML. The default value is inherited from the <field> element. |
Since 0.9.5.3, the bind-xml element supports a nested class mapping, which is often useful when needing to specify more than one mapping for a particular class. A good example of this is when mapping Hashtable/HashMap/Map.
<bind-xml ...> <class name="org.exolab.castor.mapping.MapItem"> <field name="key" type="java.lang.String"> <bind-xml name="id"/> </field> <field name="value" type="com.acme.Foo"/> </class> </bind-xml>
Here is an example of how Castor Mapping can be used. We want to map an XML document like the following one (called 'order.xml'). model.
<Order reference="12343-AHSHE-314159"> <Client> <Name>Jean Smith</Name> <Address>2000, Alameda de las Pulgas, San Mateo, CA 94403</Address> </Client> <Item reference="RF-0001"> <Description>Stuffed Penguin</Description> <Quantity>10</Quantity> <UnitPrice>8.95</UnitPrice> </Item> <Item reference="RF-0034"> <Description>Chocolate</Description> <Quantity5</Quantity> <UnitPrice>28.50</UnitPrice> </Item> <Item reference="RF-3341"> <Description>Cookie</Description> <Quantity>30</Quantity> <UnitPrice>0.85</UnitPrice> </Item> </Order>
Into the following object model composed of 3 classes:
MyOrder: represent an order
Client: used to store information on the client
Item: used to store item in an order
The sources of these classes follow.
import java.util.Vector; import java.util.Enumeration; public class MyOrder { private String _ref; private ClientData _client; private Vector _items; private float _total; public void setReference(String ref) { _ref = ref; } public String getReference() { return _ref; } public void setClientData(ClientData client) { _client = client; } public ClientData getClientData() { return _client; } public void setItemsList(Vector items) { _items = items; } public Vector getItemsList() { return _items; } public void setTotal(float total) { _total = total; } public float getTotal() { return _total; } // Do some processing on the data public float getTotalPrice() { float total = 0.0f; for (Enumeration e = _items.elements() ; e.hasMoreElements() ;) { Item item = (Item) e.nextElement(); total += item._quantity * item._unitPrice; } return total; } }
public class ClientData { private String _name; private String _address; public void setName(String name) { _name = name; } public String getName() { return _name; } public void setAddress(String address) { _address = address; } public String getAddress() { return _address; } }
public class Item { public String _reference; public int _quantity; public float _unitPrice; public String _description; }
The XML document and the java object model can be connected by using the following mapping file:
<?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE mapping PUBLIC "-//EXOLAB/Castor Mapping DTD Version 1.0//EN" "http://castor.org/mapping.dtd"> <mapping> <class name="MyOrder"> <map-to xml="Order"/> <field name="Reference" type="java.lang.String"> <bind-xml name="reference" node="attribute"/> </field> <field name="Total" type="float"> <bind-xml name="total-price" node="attribute"/> </field> <field name="ClientData" type="ClientData"> <bind-xml name="Client"/> </field> <field name="ItemsList" type="Item" collection="vector"> <bind-xml name="Item"/> </field> </class> <class name="ClientData"> <field name="Name" type="java.lang.String"> <bind-xml name="Name" node="element"/> </field> <field name="Address" type="java.lang.String"> <bind-xml name="Address" node="element"/> </field> </class> <class name="Item"> <field name="_reference" type="java.lang.String" direct="true"> <bind-xml name="reference" node="attribute"/> </field> <field name="_quantity" type="integer" direct="true"> <bind-xml name="Quantity" node="element"/> </field> <field name="_unitPrice" type="float" direct="true"> <bind-xml name="UnitPrice" node="element"/> </field> <field name="_description" type="string" direct="true"> <bind-xml name="Description" node="element"/> </field> </class> </mapping>
The following class is an example of how to use Castor XML Mapping to manipulate the file 'order.xml'. It unmarshals the document 'order.xml', computes the total price, sets the total price in the java object and marshals the object model back into XML with the calculated price.
import org.exolab.castor.mapping.Mapping; import org.exolab.castor.mapping.MappingException; import org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller; import org.exolab.castor.xml.Marshaller; import java.io.IOException; import java.io.FileReader; import java.io.OutputStreamWriter; import org.xml.sax.InputSource; public class main { public static void main(String args[]) { Mapping mapping = new Mapping(); try { // 1. Load the mapping information from the file mapping.loadMapping( "mapping.xml" ); // 2. Unmarshal the data Unmarshaller unmar = new Unmarshaller(mapping); MyOrder order = (MyOrder)unmar.unmarshal(new InputSource(new FileReader("order.xml"))); // 3. Do some processing on the data float total = order.getTotalPrice(); System.out.println("Order total price = " + total); order.setTotal(total); // 4. marshal the data with the total price back and print the XML in the console Marshaller marshaller = new Marshaller(new OutputStreamWriter(System.out)); marshaller.setMapping(mapping); marshaller.marshal(order); } catch (Exception e) { System.out.println(e); return; } } }
Ordinarily, a mapping will only reference types that are concrete classes (i.e. not interfaces nor abstract classes). The reason is that to unmarshal a type requires instantiating it and one cannot instantiate an interface. However, in many real situations, object models depend on the use of interfaces. Many class properties are defined to have interface types to support the ability to swap implementations. This is often the case in frameworks.
The problem is that a different mapping must be used each time the same model is to be used to marshal/unmarshal an implementation that uses different concrete types. This is not convenient. The mapping should represent the model and the specific concrete type used to unmarshal a document is a configuration parameter; it should be specified in the instance document to be unmarshalled, not the mapping.
For example, assume a very simple object model of an engine that has one property that is a processor:
public interface IProcessor { public void process(); } public class Engine { private IProcessor processor; public IProcessor getProcessor() { return processor; } public void setProcessor(IProcessor processor) { this.processor = processor; } }
A typical mapping file for such a design may be:
<mapping> <class name="Engine"> <map-to xml="engine" /> <field name="processor" type="IProcessor" required="true"> <bind-xml name="processor" node="element" /> </field> </class> </mapping>
It is possible to use such a mapping and still have the marshal/unmarshal process work by specifying the concrete implementation of IProcessor in the document to be unmarshalled, using the xsi:type attribute, as follows:
<engine>
<processor xsi:type="java:com.abc.MyProcessor" />
</engine>
In this manner, one is still able to maintain only a single mapping, but vary the manner in which the document is unmarshalled from one instance document to the next. This flexibility is powerful because it enables the support of polymorphism within the castor xml marshalling framework.
Suppose we wanted the following XML instead:
<engine> <myProcessor/> </engine>
In the above output our XML name changed to match the type of the class used instead of relying on the xsi:type attribute. This can be achieved by modifying the mapping file as such:
<mapping> <class name="Engine"> <map-to xml="engine" /> <field name="processor" type="IProcessor" required="true"> <bind-xml auto-naming="deriveByClass" node="element" /> </field> </class> <class name="MyProcessor"> <map-to xml="myProcessor" /> </class> </mapping>
Since 0.9.5
The location attribute allows the user to map fields from nested elements or specify a wrapper element for a given field. Wrapper elements are simply elements which appear in the XML instance, but do not have a direct mapping to an object or field within the object model.
For example to map an instance of the following class:
public class Foo { private Bar bar = null; public Foo(); public getBar() { return bar; } public void setBar(Bar bar) { this.bar = bar; } }
into the following XML instance:
<?xml version="1.0"?> <foo>; <abc> <bar>...</bar> </abc> </foo>
(notice that an 'abc' field doesn't exist in the Bar class) One would use the following mapping:
<?xml version="1.0"?> ... <class name="Foo"> <field name="bar" type="Bar"> <bind-xml name="bar" location="abc"/> </field> </class> ... </mapping>
Note the "location" attribute. The value of this attribute is the name of the wrapper element. To use more than one wrapper element, the name is separated by a forward-slash as such:
<bind-xml name="bar" location="abc/xyz" />
Note that the name of the element is not part of the location itself and that the location is always relative to the class in which the field is being defined. This works for attributes also:
<bind-xml name="bar" location="abc" node="attribute" />
will produce the following:
<?xml version="1.0"?> <foo> <abc bar="..."/>; </foo>
Some helpful hints...
Castor comes with a tool that can automatically create a mapping from class files. Please see the XML FAQ for more information.
Sometimes to handle complex situations you'll need to create your own FieldHandler. Normally a FieldHandler deals with a specific class and field, however generic, reusable FieldHandlers can also be created by extending org.exolab.castor.mapping.GeneralizedFieldHandler or org.exolab.castor.mapping.AbstractFieldHandler. The FieldHandler can be specified on the <field> element.
For more information on writing a custom FieldHandler please see the following: XML FieldHandlers.
You may map any attributes to constructor arguments. For more information on how to map constructor arguments see the information available in the section on set-method above.
Please note that mapping elements to constructor arguments is not yet supported.
Tip: the XML HOW-TO section has a HOW-TO document for mapping constructor arguments.
Sometimes it's useful to prevent Castor from checking for a default constructor, such as when trying to write a mapping for an interface or type-safe enum. You can use the "undocumented" verify-constructable="false" attribute on the <class> element to prevent Castor from looking for the default constructor.
While you can always use your own custom FieldHandler for handling type-safe enumeration classes, Castor does have a built-in approach to dealing with these types of classes. If the type-safe enum class has a public static <type> valueOf(String) method Castor will call that method so that the proper instance of the enumeration is returned. Note: You'll also need to disable the default constructor check in the mapping file (see section 7.4 above to see more on this).
Before using the
Marshaller
class for marshalling Java objects to XML, the
Marshaller
can be fine-tuned according to your needs by calling a
variety of set-methods on this class. This section enlists
the available properties and provides you with information
about their meaning, possible values and the default value.
Table 1.10. Marshaller properties
Name | Description | Values | Default | Since |
---|---|---|---|---|
suppressNamespaces |
true
or
false
|
false
| - |
Before using the
Unmarshaller
class for unmarshalling Java objects from XML, the
Unmarshaller
can be fine-tuned according to your needs by calling a
variety of set-methods on this class. This section enlists
the available properties and provides you with information
about their meaning, possible values and the default value.
Table 1.11. Unmarshaller properties
Name | Description | Values | Default | Since |
---|---|---|---|---|
rootObject | A Class instance identifying the root class to use for unmarshalling. | - | - |
Being an XML data binding framework by definition, Castor XML relies on the availability of an XML parser at run-time. In Java, an XML parser is by default accessed though either the DOM or the SAX APIs: that implies that the XML Parser used needs to comply with either (or both) of these APIs.
With the creation of the JAXP API (and its addition to the Java language definition as of Java 5.0), Castor internally has been enabled to allow usage of the JAXP interfaces to interface to XML parsers. As such, Castor XML allows the use of a JAXP-compliant XML parser as well.
By default, Castor ships with Apache Xerces 2.6.2. You may, of course, upgrade to a newer version of Apache Xerces at your convenience, or switch to any other XML parser as long as it is JAXP compliant or implements a particular SAX interface. Please note that users of Java 5.0 and above do not need to have Xerces available at run-time, as JAXP and Xerces have both been integrated into the run-time library of Java.
For marshalling, Castor XML can equally use any JAXP complaint XML parser (or
interact with an XML parser that implements the SAX API), with the exception
of the following special case: when using 'pretty printing' during marshalling
(by setting the corresponding property in castor.properties
to true
) with Java 1.4 or below,
Apache Xerces
has to be on the classpath, as Castor XML internally uses Xerces' XMLSerializer
to implement this feature.
The following table enlists the requirements relative to the Java version used in your environment.
Table 1.12. XML APIs on various Java versions
Java 1.4 and below | Java 5.0 and above |
---|---|
Xerces 2.6.2 | - |
XML APIs | - |
Added a section on how to access the properties as defined in the Castor properties file from within code.
Release 1.2.1:
: Added new
org.exolab.castor.xml.lenient.integer.validation
property to allow configuration of leniency for
validation for Java properties generated from
<xs:integer>
types during code generation.
Release 1.2:
: Access to the
org.exolab.castor.util.LocalConfiguration
class has been removed completely. To access the
properties as used by Castor from code, please refer
to the below section.
Release 1.1.3: Added special processing of proxied classes. The property org.exolab.castor.xml.proxyInterfaces allows you to specify a list of interfaces that such proxied objects implement. If your object implements one of these interfaces Castor will not use the class itself but its superclass at introspection or to find class mappings and ClassDescriptors.
Release 0.9.7:
Added new org.exolab.castor.persist.useProxies
property to allow configuration of JDBC proxy
classes. If enabled, JDBC proxy classes will be used
to wrap
java.sql.Connection
and
java.sql.PreparedStatement
instances, to allow for more detailed and complete
JDBC statements to be output during logging. When
turned off, no logging statements will be generated
at all.
Castor uses a configuration file for environmental
properties that are shared across all the Castor sub
systems. The configuration file is specified as a Java
properties file with the name castor.properties
.
By definition, a default configuration file is included with the Castor XML JAR. Custom properties can be supplied using one of the following methods. Please note that the custom properties specified will override the default configuration.
Place a file named castor.properties
anywhere on the classpath of your application.
Place a file named castor.properties
in the working directory of your application.
Use the system property
org.castor.user.properties.location
to
specify the location of your custom properties.
Please note that Castor XML - upon startup - will try the methods given above in exactly the sequence as stated above; if it managed to find a custom property file using any of the given methods, it will cancel its search.
When running the provided examples, Castor will use the configuration file located in the examples directory which specifies additional debugging information as well as pretty printing of all produced XML documents.
The following properties are currently supported in the configuration file:
Table 1.13.
Name | Description | Values | Default | Since |
---|---|---|---|---|
org.exolab.castor.xml.introspector.primitive.nodetype |
Property specifying the type of XML node to use
for primitive values, either
element
or
attribute
|
element
or
attribute
|
attribute
| - |
org.exolab.castor.parser | Property specifying the class name of the SAX XML parser to use. | - | - | - |
org.exolab.castor.parser.validation | Specifies whether to perform XML document validation by default. |
true
and
false
|
false
| - |
org.exolab.castor.parser.namespaces | Specifies whether to support XML namespaces by default. |
false
and
true
|
false
| - |
org.exolab.castor.xml.nspackages | Specifies a list of XML namespace to Java package mappings. | - | - | - |
org.exolab.castor.xml.naming |
Property specifying the 'type' of the XML naming
conventions to use. Values of this property must
be either
mixed
,
lower
, or the name of a class which extends
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLNaming
.
|
mixed
,
lower
, or the name of a class which extends
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLNaming
|
lower
| - |
org.castor.xml.java.naming |
Property specifying the 'type' of the Java
naming conventions to use. Values of this
property must be either
null
or the name of a class which extends
link org.castor.xml.JavaNaming .
|
|
null
| - |
org.exolab.castor.marshalling.validation | Specifies whether to use validation during marshalling. |
false
or
true
|
true
| - |
org.exolab.castor.indent | Specifies whether XML documents (as generated at marshalling) should use indentation or not. |
false
or
true
|
false
| - |
org.exolab.castor.sax.features | Specifies additional features for the XML parser. | A comma separated list of SAX (parser) features (that might or might not be supported by the specified SAX parser). | - | - |
org.exolab.castor.sax.features-to-disable | Specifies features to be disbaled on the underlying SAX parser. | A comma separated list of SAX (parser) features to be disabled. | - |
1.0.4 |
org.exolab.castor.regexp | Specifies the regular expression validator to use. |
A class that implements
org.exolab.castor.xml.validators.RegExpValidator
.
| - | - |
org.exolab.castor.xml.strictelements | Specifies whether to apply strictness to elements when unmarshalling. When enabled, the existence of elements in the XML document, which cannot be mapped to a class, causes a {@link SAXException} to be thrown. If set to false, these 'unknown' elements are ignored. |
false
or
true
|
true
| - |
org.exolab.castor.xml.loadPackageMappings |
Specifies whether the ClassDescriptorResolver
should (automatically) search for and consult
with package mapping files (
.castor.xml
) to retrieve class descriptor information
|
false
or
true
|
true
| 1.0.2 |
org.exolab.castor.xml.serializer.factory | Specifying what XML serializers factory to use. | A class name | org.exolab.castor.xml.XercesXMLSerializerFactory | 1.0 |
org.exolab.castor.xml.lenient.sequence.order | Specifies whether sequence order validation should be lenient. |
false
or
true
|
false
| 1.1 |
org.exolab.castor.xml.lenient.id.validation | Specifies whether id/href validation should be lenient. |
false
or
true
|
false
| 1.1 |
org.exolab.castor.xml.proxyInterfaces | Specifies whether or not to search for an proxy interface at marshalling. If property is not empty the objects to be marshalled will be searched if they implement one of the given interface names. If the interface is implemented, the superclass will be marshalled instead of the class itself. | A list of proxy interfaces | - | 1.1.3 |
org.exolab.castor.xml.lenient.integer.validation |
Specifies whether validation for Java properties
generated from <xs:integer> should be
lenient, i.e. allow for
int
s as well.
|
false
or
true
|
false
| 1.2.1 |
As of Castor 1.1, it is possible to read and set the value
of properties programmatically using the
getProperty(String)
and
setProperty(String,String)
on the following classes:
org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller
org.exolab.castor.xml.Marshaller
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext
Whilst using the setter methods on the first two classes
will change the settings of the respective instances only,
using the
setProperty()
method on the
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext
class will change the configuration globally, and affect all
org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller
and
org.exolab.castor.xml.Marshaller
instances created thereafter using the
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext.createUnmarshaller()
and
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext.createMarshaller()
methods.
When developing using Castor, we recommend that you use the various
setLogWriter
methods to get detailed information and error
messages.
Using a logger with org.exolab.castor.mapping.Mapping
will
provide detailed information about mapping decisions made by Castor and
will show the SQL statements being used.
Using a logger with org.exolab.castor.jdo.JDO
will provide
trace messages that show when Castor is loading, storing, creating and
deleting objects. All database operations will appear in the log; if an
object is retrieved from the cache or is not modified, there will be no
trace of load/store operations.
Using a logger with org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller
will
provide trace messages that show conflicts between the XML document and
loaded objects.
A simple trace logger can be obtained from
org.exolab.castor.util.Logger
. This logger uses the
standard output stream, but prefixes each line with a short message
that indicates who generated it. It can also print the time and date of
each message. Since logging is used for warning messages and simple
tracing, Castor does not require a sophisticated logging mechanism.
Interested in integratating Castor's logging with Log4J? Then see this question in the JDO FAQ.
By default the marshaler writes XML documents without indentation. When
developing using Castor or when debugging an application that uses
Castor, it might be desireable to use indentation to make the XML
documents human-readable. To turn indentation on, modify the Castor
properties file, or create a new properties file in the classpath
(named castor.properties
) with the following content:
org.exolab.castor.indent=true
Indentation inflates the size of the generated XML documents, and also consumes more CPU. It is recommended not to use indentation in a production environment.
It is possible to disable the validation in the marshaling framework
by modifying the Castor properties file or by creating a new
properties file in the classpath (named castor.properties
)
with the following content:
org.exolab.castor.marshalling.validation=false
Note | |
---|---|
This only works with Castor-XML. |
To save time when writing your mappings, try using the auto-complete attribute of class. When using auto-complete, Castor will introspect your class and automatically fill in any missing fields.
Example:
<class name="com.acme.Foo" auto-complete="true"/>
This is also compatible with generated descriptor files. You can use a mapping file to override some of the behavior of a compiled descriptor by using auto-complete.
Note | |
---|---|
Be careful to make sure you use the exact field name as specified in the generated descriptor file in order to modify the behavior of the field descriptor! Otherwise, you'll probably end up with two fields being marshaled! |
Castor requires that classes have a public, no-argument constructor in order to provide the ability to marshal & unmarshal objects of that type.
create-method is an optional attribute to the <field>
mapping
element that can be used to overcome this restriction in cases where you
have an existing object model that consists of, say, singleton classes
where public, no-argument constructors must not be present by definition.
Assume for example that a class "A
" that you want to be able
to unmarshal uses a singleton class as one of its properties. When
attempting to unmarshal class "A
", you should get an exception
because the singleton property has no public no-arg constructor.
Assuming that a reference to the singleton can be obtained via a static
getInstance() method, you can add a "create method" to class A
like this:
public MySingleton getSingletonProperty() { return MySingleton.getInstance(); }
and in the mapping file for class A
, you can define
the singleton property like this:
<field name="mySingletonProperty" type="com.u2d.MySingleton" create-method="getSingletonProperty"> <bind-xml name="my-singleton-property" node="element" /> </field>
This illustrates how the create-method attribute is quite a useful mechanism for dealing with exceptional situations where you might want to take advantage of marshaling even when some classes do not have no-argument public constructors.
Note | |
---|---|
As of this writing, the specified create-method must
exist as a method in the current class (i.e. the class being described
by the current |
Castor allows control on the object being marshaled or unmarshaled by a set of two listener interfaces: MarshalListener and UnmarshalListener.
The MarshalListener interface located in org.exolab.castor.xml
listens to
two different events that are intercepted by the following methods:
preMarshal: this method is called before an object gets marshaled.
postMarshal: this method is called once an object has been marshaled.
The UnmarshalListener located also in org.castor.xml
listens to
four different events that are intercepted by the following methods:
initialized: this method is called once an object has been instantiated.
attributesProcessed: this method is called when the attributes have just been read and processed.
fieldAdded: this method is called when an object is added to a parent.
unmarshalled: this method is called when an object has been fully unmarshaled
Note: The UnmarshalListener
had been part of org.exolab.castor.xml
but as an extention of this interface had been required a new interface in org.castor.xml
was introduced. Currently the org.exolab.castor.xml.UnmarshalListener
interface
can still be used but is deprecated.
Sometimes we need to deal with a data format that Castor doesn't
support out-of-the-box, such as an unsupported Date/Time
representation, or we want to wrap and unwrap fields in Wrapper
objects to get the desired XML output without changing our object
model. To handle these cases Castor allows specifying a custom
org.exolab.castor.mapping.FieldHandler
which can do these varying conversions during calls to the fields
setter and getter methods.
Note | |
---|---|
The FieldHandler is the basic interface used by the Castor Framework when accessing field values or setting them. By specifying a custom FieldHandler in the mapping file we can basically intercept the calls to retrieve or set a field's value and do whatever conversions are necessary. |
When a writing a FieldHandler handler we need to provide implementations of the various methods specified in the FieldHandler interface. The main two methods are the getValue and setValue methods which will basically handle all our conversion code. The other methods provide ways to create a new instance of the field's value or reset the field value.
Tip | |
---|---|
It's actually even easier to write custom field handlers if we use a GeneralizedFieldHandler. See more details in Section 1.7.3, “Writing a GeneralizedFieldHandler” |
Let's take a look at how to convert a date in the format YYYY-MM-DD using
a custom FieldHandler. We want to marshal the following XML input file text.xml
:
<?xml version="1.0"?> <root>2004-05-10</root>
The class we'll be marshalling from and unmarshalling to looks as follows:
import java.util.Date; public class Root { private Date _date; public Root() { super(); } public Date getDate() { return _date; } public void setDate(final Date date) { _date = date; }
So we need to write a custom FieldHandler that takes the input String and converts it into the proper java.util.Date instance:
import org.exolab.castor.mapping.FieldHandler; import org.exolab.castor.mapping.FieldDescriptor; import org.exolab.castor.mapping.ValidityException; import java.text.ParseException; import java.text.SimpleDateFormat; import java.util.Date; /** * The FieldHandler for the Date class * */ public class MyDateHandler implements FieldHandler { private static final String FORMAT = "yyyy-MM-dd"; /** * Creates a new MyDateHandler instance */ public MyDateHandler() { super(); } /** * Returns the value of the field from the object. * * @param object The object * @return The value of the field * @throws IllegalStateException The Java object has changed and * is no longer supported by this handler, or the handler is not * compatible with the Java object */ public Object getValue(final Object object) throws IllegalStateException { Root root = (Root)object; Date value = root.getDate(); if (value == null) return null; SimpleDateFormat formatter = new SimpleDateFormat(FORMAT); Date date = (Date)value; return formatter.format(date); } /** * Sets the value of the field on the object. * * @param object The object * @param value The new value * @throws IllegalStateException The Java object has changed and * is no longer supported by this handler, or the handler is not * compatible with the Java object * @throws IllegalArgumentException The value passed is not of * a supported type */ public void setValue(Object object, Object value) throws IllegalStateException, IllegalArgumentException { Root root = (Root)object; SimpleDateFormat formatter = new SimpleDateFormat(FORMAT); Date date = null; try { date = formatter.parse((String)value); } catch(ParseException px) { throw new IllegalArgumentException(px.getMessage()); } root.setDate(date); } /** * Creates a new instance of the object described by this field. * * @param parent The object for which the field is created * @return A new instance of the field's value * @throws IllegalStateException This field is a simple type and * cannot be instantiated */ public Object newInstance(Object parent) throws IllegalStateException { //-- Since it's marked as a string...just return null, //-- it's not needed. return null; } /** * Sets the value of the field to a default value. * * Reference fields are set to null, primitive fields are set to * their default value, collection fields are emptied of all * elements. * * @param object The object * @throws IllegalStateException The Java object has changed and * is no longer supported by this handler, or the handler is not * compatible with the Java object */ public void resetValue(Object object) throws IllegalStateException, IllegalArgumentException { ((Root)object).setDate(null); } }
Tip | |
---|---|
The newInstance method should return null for immutable types. |
Note | |
---|---|
There is also an
|
In order to tell Castor that we want to use our Custom FieldHandler
we must specify it in the mapping file mapping.xml
:
<?xml version="1.0"?> <mapping> <class name="Root"> <field name="date" type="string" handler="MyDateHandler"> <bind-xml node="text"/> </field> </class> </mapping>
We can now use a simple Test class to unmarshal our XML document:
import java.io.*; import org.exolab.castor.xml.*; import org.exolab.castor.mapping.*; public class Test { public static void main(String[] args) { try { //--load mapping Mapping mapping = new Mapping(); mapping.loadMapping("mapping.xml"); System.out.println("unmarshalling root instance:"); System.out.println(); Reader reader = new FileReader("test.xml"); Unmarshaller unmarshaller = new Unmarshaller(Root.class); unmarshaller.setMapping(mapping); Root root = (Root) unmarshaller.unmarshal(reader); reader.close(); System.out.println("Root#getDate : " + root.getDate()); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } }
Now simply compile the code and run!
% java Test unmarshalling root instance: Root#getDate : Mon May 10 00:00:00 CDT 2004
After running our test program we can see that Castor invoked our custom FieldHandler and we got our properly formatted date in our Root.class.
A org.exolab.castor.mapping.GeneralizedFieldHandler
is an extension of FieldHandler interface
where we simply write the conversion methods and Castor will automatically
handle the underlying get/set operations. This allows us to re-use the
same FieldHandler for fields from different classes that require the
same conversion.
Note | |
---|---|
Note: Currently the GeneralizedFieldHandler cannot be used from a binding-file for use with the SourceGenerator, an enhancement patch will be checked into SVN for this feature, shortly after 0.9.6 final is released. |
The same FieldHandler we used above can be written as a GeneralizedFieldHandler as such:
import org.exolab.castor.mapping.GeneralizedFieldHandler; import org.exolab.castor.mapping.FieldDescriptor; import java.text.ParseException; import java.text.SimpleDateFormat; import java.util.Date; /** * The FieldHandler for the Date class * */ public class MyDateHandler extends GeneralizedFieldHandler { private static final String FORMAT = "yyyy-MM-dd"; /** * Creates a new MyDateHandler instance */ public MyDateHandler() { super(); } /** * This method is used to convert the value when the * getValue method is called. The getValue method will * obtain the actual field value from given 'parent' object. * This convert method is then invoked with the field's * value. The value returned from this method will be * the actual value returned by getValue method. * * @param value the object value to convert after * performing a get operation * @return the converted value. */ public Object convertUponGet(Object value) { if (value == null) return null; SimpleDateFormat formatter = new SimpleDateFormat(FORMAT); Date date = (Date)value; return formatter.format(date); } /** * This method is used to convert the value when the * setValue method is called. The setValue method will * call this method to obtain the converted value. * The converted value will then be used as the value to * set for the field. * * @param value the object value to convert before * performing a set operation * @return the converted value. */ public Object convertUponSet(Object value) { SimpleDateFormat formatter = new SimpleDateFormat(FORMAT); Date date = null; try { date = formatter.parse((String)value); } catch(ParseException px) { throw new IllegalArgumentException(px.getMessage()); } return date; } /** * Returns the class type for the field that this * GeneralizedFieldHandler converts to and from. This * should be the type that is used in the * object model. * * @return the class type of of the field */ public Class getFieldType() { return Date.class; } /** * Creates a new instance of the object described by * this field. * * @param parent The object for which the field is created * @return A new instance of the field's value * @throws IllegalStateException This field is a simple * type and cannot be instantiated */ public Object newInstance(Object parent) throws IllegalStateException { //-- Since it's marked as a string...just return null, //-- it's not needed. return null; } }
Everything else is the same. So we can re-run our test case using this GeneralizedFieldHandler and we'll get the same result. The main difference is that we implement the convertUponGet and convertUponSet methods.
Notice that we never reference the Root
class in our GeneralizedFieldHandler
. This allows us
to use the same exact FieldHandler
for any field
that requires this type of conversion.
In some situations, the GeneralizedFieldHandler
might not
provide sufficient flexibility. Suppose your XML document uses more than one
date format. You could solve this by creating a GeneralizedFieldHandler
subclass per date format, but that would lead to code duplication, which in
itself is not desirable.
A ConfigurableFieldHandler
is a FieldHandler
that can be configured in the mapping file
with any kind and any number of parameters. You can simply configure two (or more)
instances of the same ConfigurableFieldHandler
class
with different date format patterns.
Here's a mapping file that uses a ConfigurableFieldHandler
to marshal and unmarshal the
date field, similar to the preceding examples:
<?xml version="1.0"?> <mapping> <field-handler name="myHandler" class="FieldHandlerImpl"> <param name="date-format" value="yyyyMMddHHmmss"/> </field-handler> <class name="Root"> <field name="date" type="string" handler="myHandler"/> </class> </mapping>
The field-handler element defines the
ConfigurableFieldHandler
.
The class must be an implementation of the
org.exolab.castor.mapping.ConfigurableFieldHandler
interface. This
instance is configured with a date format. However, each implementation can decide
which, and how many parameters to use.
The field handler instance is referenced by the field element, using the handler attribute.
Here's the ConfigurableFieldHandler implementation:
import java.text.ParseException; import java.text.SimpleDateFormat; import java.util.Date; import java.text.ParseException; import java.text.SimpleDateFormat; import java.util.Date; import java.util.Properties; import org.exolab.castor.mapping.ConfigurableFieldHandler; import org.exolab.castor.mapping.FieldHandler; import org.exolab.castor.mapping.GeneralizedFieldHandler; import org.exolab.castor.mapping.ValidityException; public class FieldHandlerImpl implements FieldHandler, ConfigurableFieldHandler { private SimpleDateFormat formatter; public void setConfiguration(final Properties config) throws ValidityException { String pattern = config.getProperty("date-format"); if (pattern == null) { throw new ValidityException("Required parameter \"date-format\" is missing for FieldHandlerImpl."); } try { formatter = new SimpleDateFormat(pattern); } catch (IllegalArgumentException e) { throw new ValidityException("Pattern \""+pattern+"\" is not a valid date format."); } } /** * Returns the value of the field from the object. * * @param object The object * @return The value of the field * @throws IllegalStateException The Java object has changed and * is no longer supported by this handler, or the handler is not * compatible with the Java object */ public Object getValue(Object object) throws IllegalStateException { Root root = (Root)object; Date value = root.getDate(); if (value == null) return null; return formatter.format(value); } /** * Sets the value of the field on the object. * * @param object The object * @param value The new value * @throws IllegalStateException The Java object has changed and * is no longer supported by this handler, or the handler is not * compatible with the Java object * @throws IllegalArgumentException The value passed is not of * a supported type */ public void setValue(Object object, Object value) throws IllegalStateException, IllegalArgumentException { Root root = (Root)object; Date date = null; try { date = formatter.parse((String)value); } catch(ParseException px) { throw new IllegalArgumentException(px.getMessage()); } root.setDate(date); } /** * Creates a new instance of the object described by this field. * * @param parent The object for which the field is created * @return A new instance of the field's value * @throws IllegalStateException This field is a simple type and * cannot be instantiated */ public Object newInstance(Object parent) throws IllegalStateException { //-- Since it's marked as a string...just return null, //-- it's not needed. return null; } /** * Sets the value of the field to a default value. * * Reference fields are set to null, primitive fields are set to * their default value, collection fields are emptied of all * elements. * * @param object The object * @throws IllegalStateException The Java object has changed and * is no longer supported by this handler, or the handler is not * compatible with the Java object */ public void resetValue(Object object) throws IllegalStateException, IllegalArgumentException { ((Root)object).setDate(null); } }
This implementation is similar to the first MyDateHandler example on this page, except that is adds a setConfiguration method as specified by the ConfigurableFieldHandler interface. All parameters that are configured in the mapping file will be passed in as a Properties object. The implementing method is responsible for processing the configuration data.
As a convenience, org.exolab.castor.mapping.AbstractFieldHandler already implements ConfigurableFieldHandler. However, the setConfiguration method is not doing anything. Any subclass of AbstractFieldHandler only has to override this method to leverage the configuration capabilities. Since AbstractFieldHandler and its subclass GeneralizedFieldHandler are useful abstract classes, you'd probably want to use them anyway. It eliminates the need to implement the ConfigurableFieldHandler interface yourself.
A number of classes such as type-safe enum style classes have no constructor, but instead have some sort of static factory method used for converting a string value into an instance of the class. With a custom FieldHandler we can allow Castor to work nicely with these types of classes.
Tip | |
---|---|
Castor XML automatically supports these types of classes if they have a specific method: public static {Type} valueOf(String)
|
Note | |
---|---|
We're working on the same support for Castor JDO |
Even though Castor XML supports the "valueOf" method type-safe enum style classes, we'll show you how to write a custom handler for these classes anyway since it's useful for any type of class regardless of the name of the factory method.
Let's look at how to write a handler for the following type-safe enum style class, which was actually generated by Castor XML (javadoc removed for brevity):
import java.io.Serializable; import java.util.Enumeration; import java.util.Hashtable; public class Color implements java.io.Serializable { public static final int RED_TYPE = 0; public static final Color RED = new Color(RED_TYPE, "red"); public static final int GREEN_TYPE = 1; public static final Color GREEN = new Color(GREEN_TYPE, "green"); public static final int BLUE_TYPE = 2; public static final Color BLUE = new Color(BLUE_TYPE, "blue"); private static java.util.Hashtable _memberTable = init(); private int type = -1; private java.lang.String stringValue = null; private Color(int type, java.lang.String value) { super(); this.type = type; this.stringValue = value; } //-- test.types.Color(int, java.lang.String) public static java.util.Enumeration enumerate() { return _memberTable.elements(); } //-- java.util.Enumeration enumerate() public int getType() { return this.type; } //-- int getType() private static java.util.Hashtable init() { Hashtable members = new Hashtable(); members.put("red", RED); members.put("green", GREEN); members.put("blue", BLUE); return members; } //-- java.util.Hashtable init() public java.lang.String toString() { return this.stringValue; } //-- java.lang.String toString() public static Color valueOf(java.lang.String string) { Object obj = null; if (string != null) obj = _memberTable.get(string); if (obj == null) { String err = "'" + string + "' is not a valid Color"; throw new IllegalArgumentException(err); } return (Color) obj; } //-- test.types.Color valueOf(java.lang.String) }
The GeneralizedFieldHandler for the above Color class is as follows (javadoc removed for brevity):
import org.exolab.castor.mapping.GeneralizedFieldHandler; import org.exolab.castor.mapping.FieldDescriptor; /** * The FieldHandler for the Color class **/ public class ColorHandler extends GeneralizedFieldHandler { public ColorHandler() { super(); } public Object convertUponGet(Object value) { if (value == null) return null; Color color = (Color)value; return color.toString(); } public Object convertUponSet(Object value) { return Color.valueOf((String)value); } public Class getFieldType() { return Color.class; } public Object newInstance( Object parent ) throws IllegalStateException { //-- Since it's marked as a string...just return null, //-- it's not needed. return null; } }
That's all there really is to it. Now we just need to hook this up to our mapping file and run a sample test.
If we have a root class Foo as such:
public class Foo { private Color _color = null; private int _size = 0; private String _name = null; public Foo() { super(); } public Color getColor() { return _color; } public String getName() { return _name; } public int getSize() { return _size; } public void setColor(Color color) { _color = color; } public void setName(String name) { _name = name; } public void setSize(int size) { _size = size; } }
Our mapping file would be the following:
<?xml version="1.0"?> <mapping> <class name="Foo"> <field name="size" type="integer"> <bind-xml node="element"/> </field> <field name="name" type="string"/> <field name="color" type="string" handler="ColorHandler"/> </class> </mapping>
We can now use our custom FieldHandler to unmarshal the following xml input:
<?xml version="1.0"?> <foo> <name>MyFoo</name> <size>345</size> <color>blue</color> </foo>
A sample test class is as follows:
import java.io.*; import org.exolab.castor.xml.*; import org.exolab.castor.mapping.*; public class Test { public static void main(String[] args) { try { //--load mapping Mapping mapping = new Mapping(); mapping.loadMapping("mapping.xml"); System.out.println("unmarshalling Foo:"); System.out.println(); Reader reader = new FileReader("test.xml"); Unmarshaller unmarshaller = new Unmarshaller(Foo.class); unmarshaller.setMapping(mapping); Foo foo = (Foo) unmarshaller.unmarshal(reader); reader.close(); System.out.println("Foo#size : " + foo.getSize()); System.out.print("Foo#color: "); if (foo.getColor() == null) { System.out.println("null"); } else { System.out.println(foo.getColor().toString()); } PrintWriter pw = new PrintWriter(System.out); Marshaller marshaller = new Marshaller(pw); marshaller.setMapping(mapping); marshaller.marshal(foo); pw.flush(); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } }
Note | |
---|---|
With Castor 0.9.6 and later, the GeneralizedFieldHandler automatically supports iterating over the items of a collection and passing them one-by-one to the convertUponGet.
For backward compatibility or to handle the collection iteration yourself,
simply add the following to the constructor of your
setCollectionIteration(false);
|
If you're going to be using custom field handlers for collection fields with
a GeneralizedFieldHandler
using versions of Castor
prior to 0.9.6, then you'll need to handle the collection iteration yourself in the
convertUponGet method.
If you're not using a GeneralizedFieldHandler
, then
you'll need to handle the collection iteration yourself in the
FieldHandler#getValue() method.
Tip | |
---|---|
Since Castor incrementally adds items to collection fields, there
usually is no need to handle collections directly in the
convertUponSet method (or the setValue() for those
not using |
There are many users of Castor XML who (want to) use Castor XML in in high-volume applications. To fine-tune Castor for such an environment, it is necessary to understand many of the product features in detail and to be able to balance their use according to the application needs. Even though many of these features are documented in various places, people frequently asked for a 'best practices' document, a document that brings together these technical topics in one place and that presents them as a set of easy-to-use recipes.
Please be aware that this document is under construction. But still we believe that this document -- even when in its conception phase -- provides valuable information to users of Castor XML.
It is not generally recommended to generate code into the default package, especially since code in the default package cannot be referenced from code in any other package.
Additionally, we recommend that generated code go into a different
package then the code that makes use of the generated code. For
example, if your application uses Castor to process an XML
configuration file that is used by code in the package
org.example.userdialog
then we do not recommend that the
generated code also go into that package. However, it would be
reasonable to generate source to process this XML configuration file
into the package org.example.userdialog.xmlconfig
.
Creating instances of org.exolab.castor.xml.Marshaller
and
org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller
for the purpose of XML
data binding is easy to achieve at the API usage level. However,
details of API use have an impact on application performance; each
instance creation involves setup operations.
This is generally not an issue for one-off invocations; however, in a multi-threaded, high volume use scenario this can be become a serious issue. Internally, Castor uses a collection of Descriptor classes to keep information about the Java entities to be marshaled and unmarshaled. With each instance creation of (Un)Marshaller, this collection will be built from scratch (again and again).
To avoid this initial configuration 'penalty', Castor allows you to
cache these Descriptor classes through its
org.exolab.castor.xml.ClassDescriptorResolver
component.
This cache allows reuse of these Descriptor instances between
(Un)Marshaller invocations.
With the introduction of the new org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext
class, the use of a
ClassDescriptorResolver
has been greatly simplified in that such
an instance is managed by the XMLContext per default. As such, there's no need
to pass a ClassDescriptorResolver
instance to
Marshaller
/
Unmarshaller
instances anymore, as this is done automatically
when such instances are created through
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext.createMarshaller()
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext.createUnmarshaller()
For example, to create a Marshaller
instance that is pre-configured
with an instance of ClassDescriptorResolver
, use the following code
fragment:
Mapping mapping = new Mapping(); mapping.loadMapping(new InputSource(...)); XMLContext context = new XMLContext(); context.addMapping(mapping); Marshaller marshaller = context.createMarshaller();
In the case where no mapping file is used, it is still possible
to instruct the org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext
to
pre-load class descriptors for a given
package via the methods enlisted below.
As above, create an instance of org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext
and configure it according to your needs as shown below:
XMLContext context = new XMLContext(); context.addPackage("your.package.name"); Marshaller marshaller = context.createMarshaller();
The org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext
class
provides for various methods to load class descriptors for individual classes
and/or packages.
Table 1.14. Methods on XMLContext to create Un-/Marshaller objects
Method | Description | .castor.cdr |
---|---|---|
addClass(Class) on org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext | Loads the class descriptor for one class. | n/a |
addClass(Class[]) on org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext | Loads the class descriptors for a collection of classes. | n/a |
addPackage(String) on org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext | Loads the class descriptor for all classes in the defined package. | Required |
addPackages(String[]) on org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLContext | Loads the class descriptor for all classes in the defined packages. | Required |
Note | |
---|---|
For some of the methods, pre-loading class descriptords will only work if you provide
the |
When you do not use the XMLContext
class, you will have
to manually manage your
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLClassDescriptorResolver
. To do
so, first create an instance of
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLClassDescriptorResolver
using the following code fragment:
XMLClassDescriptorResolver classDescriptorResolver =
(XMLClassDescriptorResolver) ClassDescriptorResolverFactory.createClassDescriptorResolver(BindingType.XML);
MappingUnmarshaller mappingUnmarshaller = new MappingUnmarshaller();
MappingLoader mappingLoader =
mappingUnmarshaller.getMappingLoader(mapping, BindingType.XML);
classDescriptorResolver.setMappingLoader(mappingLoader);
and then reuse this instance as shown below:
Unmarshaller unmarshaller = new Unmarshaller();
unmarshaller.setResolver(classDescriptorResolver);
unmarshaller.unmarshal(...);
When you are not using a mapping file, but you have generated Java
classes and their corresponding descriptor classes using the Castor
XML code generator, you might want to instruct the
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLClassDescriptorResolver
to
pre-load class descriptors (as enumerated explicitly
or for a given package) using various add*
methods.
As above, create an instance of
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLClassDescriptorResolver">XMLClassDescriptorResolver
using the following code fragment:
XMLClassDescriptorResolver classDescriptorResolver = (XMlClassDescriptorResolver) ClassDescriptorResolverFactory.createClassDescriptorResolver(BindingType.XML); classDescriptorResolver.setClassLoader(...); classDescriptorResolver.addClass("your.package.name.A"); classDescriptorResolver.addClass("your.package.name.B"); classDescriptorResolver.addClass("your.package.name.C");
and then reuse this instance as shown above. Alternatively, add complete packages to the resolver configuration as follows:
XMLClassDescriptorResolver classDescriptorResolver = (XMlClassDescriptorResolver)
ClassDescriptorResolverFactory.createClassDescriptorResolver(BindingType.XML);
classDescriptorResolver.setClassLoader(...);
classDescriptorResolver.addPackage("your.package.name");
The org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLClassDescriptorResolver
interface provides various other methods to load class descriptors for individual
classes and/or packages.
Table 1.15. blah
Method | Description | Requires .castor.cdr |
---|---|---|
addClass(String) | Loads the class descriptor for one class. | No |
addClass(String[]) | Loads the class descriptors for a collection of classes. | No |
addPackage(String) | Loads the class descriptors for all classes in the package defined. | Yes |
addPackages(String[]) | Loads the class descriptors for all classes in the package defined. | Yes |
Note | |
---|---|
For some of the methods, pre-loading class descriptords will only work if you provide
the |
This is a collection of HOW-TOs. The Castor project is actively seeking additional HOW-TO contributors to expand this collection. For information on how to do that, please see 'How to write a How-to'.
How to Author a How-To (Author wanted!)
How to Author an FAQ (Author wanted!)
How to Author a Code Snippet (Author wanted!)
How to Author Core Documentation (Author wanted!)
How to Contribute a Patch via Jira (Author wanted!)
This section provides answers to frequently answered questions, i.e. questions that have been asked repeatedly on one of the mailing lists. Please check with these F.A.Q.s frequently, as addressing questions that have been answered in the past already again and again places an unnecessary burden on the committers/contributors.
This section is structured along the lines of the following areas ...
Create a new instance of the
Marshaller
class and use the
setEncoding
method. You'll also need to make sure the encoding for
the Writer is set properly as well:
... String encoding = "ISO-8859-1"; FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream("result.xml"); OutputStreamWriter osw = new OuputStreamWriter(fos, encoding); Marshaller marshaller = new Marshaller(osw); marshaller.setEncoding(encoding); ...
Note | |
---|---|
For Castor 0.9.5.2 only |
The issue occurs with newer versions of Xerces than the version 1.4 that ships with Castor. The older version works OK. For some reason, when the newer version of Xerces encounters an "xml" prefixed attribute, such as "xml:lang", it tries to automatically start a prefix mapping for "xml". Which, in my opinion, is technically incorrect. They shouldn't be doing that. According to the w3c, the "xml" prefix should never be declared.
The reason it started appearing in the new Castor (0.9.5.2), is because of a switch to SAX 2 by default during unmarshaling.
Solution: A built in work-around has been checked into the Castor SVN and will automatically exist in any post 0.9.5.2 releases. For those who are using 0.9.5.2 and can't upgrade, I found a simple workaround (tested with Xerces 2.5). At first I thought about disabling namespace processing in Xerces, but then realized that it's already disabled by default by Castor ... so I have no idea why they call #startPrefixMapping when namespace processing has been disabled. But in any event... explicitly enabling namespace processing seems to fix the problem:
in the
castor.properties
file, change the following line:
org.exolab.castor.parser.namespaces=false
to:
org.exolab.castor.parser.namespaces=true
Note | |
---|---|
This work-around has only been tested with Xerces 2.5 and above. |
The get method will be called a second time during the validation process. To prevent this from happening, simply disable validation on the Marshaller or Unmarshaller.
Cache the descriptors!
import org.exolab.castor.xml.ClassDescriptorResolver; import org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller; import org.exolab.castor.xml.util.ClassDescriptorResolverImpl; ... ClassDescriptorResolver cdr = new ClassDescriptorResovlerImpl(); ... Unmarshaller unm = new Unmarshaller(...); unm.setResolver(cdr);
By reusing the same ClassDescriptorResolver
any
time you create an Unmarshaller instance, you
will be reusing the existing class descriptors
previously loaded.
Disable validation
unm.setValidation(false);
Reuse objects
To cut down on object creation, you can reuse an existing object model, but be careful because this is an experimental feature. Create an Unmarshaller with your existing root object and set object reuse to true...
Unmarshaller unm = new
Unmarshaller(myObjectRoot);
unm.setReuseObjects(true);
If you have enabled pretty-printing (indenting), then disable it. The Xerces Serializer is much slower with indenting enabled.
Try changing parsers to something other than Xerces.
There are probably other approaches you can use as well, but those seem to be the most popular ones. Let us know if you have a solution that you think we should add here.
Use the
Unmarshaller#setIgnoreExtraElements()
method:
Unmarshaller unm = new Unmarshaller(...);
unm.setIgnoreExtraElements(true);
If any elements appear in the XML instance that Castor cannot find mappings for, they will be skipped.
You can also set the
org.exolab.castor.xml.strictelements
property in the
castor.properties
file:
org.exolab.castor.xml.strictelements=false
Castor loads the castor.properties in the following order:
From classpath (usually from the jar file)
From {java.home}/lib (if present)
From the local working directory
Each properties file overrides the previous. So you don't have to come up with a properties file with all the properties and values, just the ones you want to change. This also means you don't have to touch the properties file found in the jar file.
Note | |
---|---|
Note: You can also use
|
Make sure you are not using one of the static methods on the Marshaller/Unmarshaller. Any configuration changes that you make to the Marshaller or Unmarshaller are not available from the static methods.
Yes! We provide one such tool, see
org.exolab.castor.tools.MappingTool
. There are some
3rd party
tools as well.
For a specific field you can use a QName for the value of the bind-xml name attribute as such:
<bind-xml name="foo:bar" xmlns:foo="http://www.acme.com/foo"/>
Note: The namespace prefix is only used for qualification during the loading of the mapping, it is not used during Marshaling. To map namespace prefixes during marshaling you currently need to set these via the Marshaler directly.
For a class mapping, use the <map-to> element. For more information see the XML Mapping documentation .
For all versions of Castor:
To enable pretty-printing (indenting, line-breaks) just modify the castor.properties file and uncomment the following:
# True if all documents should be indented on output by default # #org.exolab.castor.indent=true
Note: This will slow down the marshalling process
If you are using Castor's default introspection to automatically map the objects into XML, then there is no guarantee on the order. It simply depends on the order in which the fields are returned to Castor using the Java reflection API.
Note: If you use a mapping file Castor will generate the XML in the order in which the mapping file is specified.
Not directly, however you can convert your DTD to an XML
Schema fairly easily. We provide a tool (
org.exolab.castor.xml.dtd.Converter
) to do this. You can also use any number of 3rd-party
tools such as XML Spy or XML Authority.
Also: I used the source code generator, but all my xml element names are getting marshaled as lowercase with hyphens, what's up with that?
Solution: Are the generated class descriptors compiled? Make sure they get compiled along with the source code for the object model.
Example: Castor generates the following:
import types.Foo;
instead of:
import com.acme.types.Foo;
This usually happens when the namespaces for the imported schemas have not been mapped to appropriate java packages in the castorbuilder.properties file.
Solution:
Make sure the
castorbuilder.properties
is in your classpath when you run the
SourceGenerator.
Uncomment and edit the
org.exolab.castor.builder.nspackages
property. Make sure to copy the value of the
imported namespace exactly as it's referred
to in the schema (i.e. trailing slashes and
case-sensitivity matter!).
For those using 0.9.5.1, you'll need to upgrade due to a bug that is fixed in later releases.
For Castor 0.9.4 and above:
Castor JDO requires a reference to the actual collection
to be returned from the get-method. By default the
source generator does not provide such a method. To
enable such methods to be created, simple add the
following line to your
castorbuilder.properties
file:
org.exolab.castor.builder.extraCollectionMethods=true
Note: The default
castorbuilder.properties
file has this line commented out. Simply uncomment it.
Your mapping file will also need to be updated to include the proper set/get method names.
Yes! We provide such a tool. Please see
org.exolab.castor.xml.schema.util.XMLInstance2Schema
. It's not 100% perfect, but it does a reasonable job.
To enable XML validation at the parser level, please add
properties to your
castor.properties
file as follows:
org.exolab.castor.parser.namespaces=true org.exolab.castor.sax.features=http://xml.org/sax/features/validation,\ http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema,\ http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema-full-checking
Please note that the example given relies on the use of
Apache Xerces, hence the
apache.org
properties; similar options should exist for other
parsers.
When using a custom FieldHandlerFactory as in the following example
Mapping mapping = ... ; FieldHandlerFactoyt factory = ...; Marshaller m = new Marshaller(writer); ClassDescriptorResolverImpl cdr = new ClassDescriptorResolverImpl(); cdr.getIntrospector().addFieldHandlerFactory(factory); m.setResolver(cdr); marshaller.setMapping(mapping);
please make sure that you set the mapping file
after
you set the ClassDescriptorResolver. You will note the
following in the Javadoc for
org.exolab.castor.xml.Marshaller.html#setResolver(org.exolab.castor.xml.ClassDescriptorResolver)
:
Note | |
---|---|
Note: This method will nullify any Mapping currently being used by this Marshaller |
Yes and no. It actually depends. When requiring pretty printing during marshalling, Castor internally relies on Apache's Xerces to implement this feature. As such, when not using this feature, Xerces is not a requirement, and any JAXP-compliant XML parser can be used (for unmarshalling).
In other words, with the latter use case, you do not have to download (and use) Xerces separetely.
No. Starting with release 1.1, we have added support for using the Xerces instance as shipped with the JRE/JDK for serialization. As such, for Java 5.0 users, this removes the requirement to download Xerces separately when wanting to use 'pretty printing' with Castor XML during marshalling.
To enable this feature, please change the following
properties in your
local
castor.properties
file (thus redefining the default value) as shown below:
# Defines the XML parser to be used by Castor. # The parser must implement org.xml.sax.Parser. org.exolab.castor.parser=org.xml.sax.helpers.XMLReaderAdapter # Defines the (default) XML serializer factory to use by Castor, which must # implement org.exolab.castor.xml.SerializerFactory; default is # org.exolab.castor.xml.XercesXMLSerializerFactory org.exolab.castor.xml.serializer.factory=org.exolab.castor.xml.XercesJDK5XMLSerializerFactory # Defines the default XML parser to be used by Castor. org.exolab.castor.parser=com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.SAXParser
Since release 1.0.2, the Castor source generator supports the optional the generation of Java 5.0 compliant code.
With release 1.3, the XML code generator will generate Java 5.0 compliant code by default.
With support for Java 5.0 enabled, the generated code will support the following Java 5.0-specific artifacts:
Use of parameterized collections, e.g.
ArrayList<String>
.
Use of @Override
annotations with the generated methods
that require it.
Use of @SuppressWarnings
with "unused" method parameters
on the generated methods that needed it.
Added "enum" to the list of reserved keywords.
To disable this feature (on by default), please amend the following property
in your custom castorbuilder.properties
file:
# Specifies whether the sources generated should be source compatible with # Java 1.4 or Java 5.0. Legal values are "1.4" and "5.0". When "5.0" is # selected, generated source will use Java 5 features such as generics and # annotations. # Defaults to "5.0". # org.exolab.castor.builder.javaVersion=5.0
Castor's Source Code Generator creates a set of Java classes which represent an object model for an XML Schema (W3C XML Schema 1.0 Second Edition, Recommendation), as well as the necessary Class Descriptors used by the marshaling framework to obtain information about the generated classes.
Note | |
---|---|
The generated source files will need to be compiled. A later release may add an Ant taskdef to handle this automatically. |
The XML code generator can be invoked in many ways, including by command line, via an Ant task and via Maven. Please follow the below links for detailed instructions on each invocation mode.
The input file for the source code generator is an XML schema[1]footnote>. The currently supported version is the W3C XML Schema 1.0, Second Edition [2]. For more information about XML schema support, check Section 2.6, “XML schema support”.
Please find below a list of properties that can be configured through the builder configuration properties, as defined in either the default or a custom XML code generator configuration file. These properties allow you to control various advanced options of the XML source generator.
Table 2.1. <column> - Definitions
Option | Description | Values | Default | Since version |
---|---|---|---|---|
org.exolab.castor.builder.javaVersion | Compliance with Java version | 1.4 /5.0 | 1.4 | 1.0.2 |
org.exolab.castor.builder.forceJava4Enums | Forces the code generator to create 'old' Java 1.4 enumeration classes even in Java 5 mode. | true /false | false | 1.1.3 |
org.exolab.castor.builder.boundproperties | Generation of bound properties | true /false | false | 0.8.9 |
org.exolab.castor.builder.javaclassmapping | Class generation mode | element /type | element | 0.9.1 |
org.exolab.castor.builder.superclass | Global super class (for all classes generated) | Any valid class name | - | 0.8.9 |
org.exolab.castor.builder.nspackages | XML namespace to package name mapping | A series of mappings | - | 0.8.9 |
org.exolab.castor.builder.equalsmethod | Generation of equals /hashCode() method | true /false | false | 0.9.1 |
org.exolab.castor.builder.primitivetowrapper | Generation of Object wrappers instead of primitives | true /false | false | 0.9.4 |
org.exolab.castor.builder.automaticConflictResolution | Specifies whether automatic class name conflict resolution should be used or not | true /false | false | 1.1.1 |
org.exolab.castor.builder.extraCollectionMethods | Specifies whether extra (additional) methods should be created for collection-style fields. Set this to true if you want your code to be more compatible with Castor JDO or other persistence frameworks. | true /false | false | 0.9.1 |
org.exolab.castor.builder.jclassPrinterFactories | Enlists the available modes for (J)Class printing during XML code generation. | org.exolab.castor.builder.printing.WriterJClassPrinterFactory /
org.exolab.castor.builder.printing.TemplateJClassPrinterFactory | n/a | 1.2.1 |
org.exolab.castor.builder.extraDocumentationMethods | specifying whether extra members/methods for extracting XML schema documentation should be made available. | true /false | false | 1.2 |
By default, the Castor XML code generator will look for such a property file in the following places:
If no custom property file is specified, the Castor XML code
generator will use the default builder configuration
properties at org/exolab/castor/builder/castorbuilder.properties
as shipped as part of the XML code generator JAR.
If a file named castorbuilder.properties
is available
on the CLASSPATH, the Castor XML code generator will use each of the
defined property values to override the default value as defined
in the default builder configuration properties. This file is commonly
referred to as a custom builder configuration file.
As of Castor 1.0.2, the Castor source generator now supports the generation of Java 5.0 compliant code. The generated code - with the new feature enabled - will make use of the following Java 5.0-specific artifacts:
Use of parameterized collections, e.g. ArrayList<String>.
Use of @Override annotations with the generated methods that require it.
Use of @SupressWarnings with "unused" method parameters on the generated methods that needed it.
Added "enum" to the list of reserved keywords.
To enable this feature (off by default), please uncomment the
following property in your custom castorbuilder.properties
file:
# This property specifies whether the sources generated # should comply with java 1.4 or 5.0; defaults to 1.4 org.exolab.castor.builder.javaVersion=5.0
In previous versions, castor only supported (un)marshalling of "simple" java5 enums, meaning enums where all facet values are valid java identifiers. In these cases, every enum constant name can be mapped directly to the xml value. See the following example:
<xs:simpleType name="AlphabeticalType"> <xs:restriction base="xs:string"> <xs:enumeration value="A"/> <xs:enumeration value="B"/> <xs:enumeration value="C"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType>
public enum AlphabeticalType {
A, B, C
}
<root> <AlphabeticalType>A</AlphabeticalType> </root>
So if there is at least ONE facet that cannot be mapped directly to a valid java identifier, we need to extend the enum pattern. Examples for these cases are value="5" or value="-s". Castor now introduces an extended pattern, similar to the jaxb2 enum handling. The actual value of the enumeration facet is stored in a private String property, the name of the enum constant is translated into a valid identifier. Additionally, some convenience methods are introduced, details about these methods are described after the following example:
<xs:simpleType name="CompositeType"> <xs:restriction base="xs:string"> <xs:enumeration value="5"/> <xs:enumeration value="10"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType>
public enum CompositeType { VALUE_5("5"), VALUE_10("10"); private final java.lang.String value; private CompositeType(final java.lang.String value) { this.value = value; } public static CompositeType fromValue(final java.lang.String value) { for (CompositeType c: CompositeType.values()) { if (c.value.equals(value)) { return c; } } throw new IllegalArgumentException(value); } public java.lang.String value() { return this.value; } public java.lang.String toString() { return this.value; } }
<root> <CompositeType>5</CompositeType> </root>
Castor uses the static void fromValue(String value)
method to retrieve the correct instance from the value in the XML
input file. In our example, the input is "5", fromValue returns
CompositeType.VALUE_5
.
Currently, we have to distinguish between enums with a class descriptor and the ones without. If you are using class descriptors, the EnumerationHandler uses the value() method to write the xml output.
If no descriptor classes are available, castor uses per default the
toString()
method to marshall the value. In this case, the override of the
java.lang.Enum.toString()
method is mandatory, because
java.lang.Enum.toString()
returns the NAME of the
facet instead of the VALUE. So in our example, VALUE_10
would be returned instead of "10". To avoid this, castor expects an
implementation of toString()
that returns
this.value
.
If the java version is set to "5.0", the new default behavior of castor is to generate complex java5 enums for simpleType enumerations, as described above. In java 1.4 mode, nothing has changed and the old style enumeration classes using a HashMap are created.
Users, who are in java5 mode and still want to use the old style java
1.4 classes, can force this by setting the new
org.exolab.castor.builder.forceJava4Enums
property
to true as follows:
# Forces the code generator to create 'old' Java 1.4 enumeration classes instead # of Java 5 enums for xs:simpleType enumerations, even in Java 5 mode. # # Possible values: # - false (default) # - true org.exolab.castor.builder.forceJava4Enums=false
Bound properties are "properties" of a class, which when
updated the class will send out a java.beans.PropertyChangeEvent
to all registered java.beans.PropertyChangeListeners
.
To enable bound properties, please add a property definition to your custom builder configuration file as follows:
# To enable bound properties uncomment the following line. Please # note that currently *all* fields will be treated as bound properties # when enabled. This will change in the future when we introduce # fine grained control over each class and it's properties. # org.exolab.castor.builder.boundproperties=true
When enabled, all properties will be treated as bound properties. For
each class that is generated a setPropertyChangeListener
method is
created as follows:
/** * Registers a PropertyChangeListener with this class. * @param pcl The PropertyChangeListener to register. **/ public void addPropertyChangeListener (java.beans.PropertyChangeListener pcl) { propertyChangeListeners.addElement(pcl); } //-- void addPropertyChangeListener
Whenever a property of the class is changed, a
java.beans.PropertyChangeEvent
will be sent to
all registered listeners. The property name, the old value and
the new value will be set in the
java.beans.PropertyChangeEvent.
Note | |
---|---|
To prevent unnecessary overhead, if the property is a collection, the old value will be null. |
The source generator can treat the XML Schema structures such as
<complexType>
and <element>
in two main ways. The first, and current default method is called the
"element" method. The other is called the "type" method.
Table 2.2. <column> - Definitions
Method | Explanation |
---|---|
'element' |
The "element" method creates classes for all elements whose type is a <complexType>. Abstract classes are created for all top-level <complexType>s. Any elements whose type is a top-level type will have a new class create that extends the abstract class which was generated for that top-level complexType. Classes are not created for elements whose type is a <simpleType>. |
'type' |
The "type" method creates classes for all top-level <complexType>s, or elements that contain an "anonymous" (in-lined) <complexType>. Classes will not be generated for elements whose type is a top-level type. |
To change the "method" of class creation, please add the following property definition to your custom builder configuration file:
# Java class mapping of <xsd:element>'s and <xsd:complexType>'s # org.exolab.castor.builder.javaclassmapping=type
The source generator enables the user to set a super class to all the generated classes (of course, class descriptors are not affected by this option). Please note that, though the binding file, it is possible to define a super class for individual classes
To set the global super class, please add the following property definition to your custom builder configuration file:
# This property allows one to specify the super class of *all* # generated classes # org.exolab.castor.builder.superclass=com.xyz.BaseObject
An XML Schema instance is identified by a namespace. For data-binding purposes, especially code generation it may be necessary to map namespaces to Java packages.
This is needed for imported schema in order for Castor to generate the correct imports during code generation for the primary schema.
To allow the mapping between namespaces and Java packages , edit the castorbuilder.properties file :
# XML namespace mapping to Java packages # #org.exolab.castor.builder.nspackages=\ http://www.xyz.com/schemas/project=com.xyz.schemas.project,\ http://www.xyz.com/schemas/person=com.xyz.schemas.person
Since version: 0.9.1
The Source Generator can override the equals()
and hashCode()
method for the generated objects.
To have equals()
and hashCode()
methods generated,
override the following property in your custom
castorbuilder.properties file:
# Set to true if you want to have an equals() and # hashCode() method generated for each generated class; # false by default org.exolab.castor.builder.equalsmethod=true
Since version 0.9.4
It may be convenient to use java objects instead of primitives, the Source Generator provides a way to do it. Thus the following mapping can be used:
boolean to java.lang.Boolean
byte to java.lang.Byte
double to java.lang.Double
float to java.lang.Float
int and integer to java.lang.Integer
long to java.lang.Long
short to java.lang.Short
To enable this property, edit the castor builder.properties file:
# Set to true if you want to use Object Wrappers instead # of primitives (e.g Float instead of float). # false by default. #org.exolab.castor.builder.primitivetowrapper=false
Since version 1.1.1
With this property enabled, the XML code generator will use a new automatic class name resolution mode that has special logic implemented to automatically resolve class name conflicts.
This new mode deals with various class name conflicts where previously a binding file had to be used to resolve these conflicts manually.
To enable this feature (turned off by default), please add the
following property definitio to your custom castorbuilder.properties
file:
# Specifies whether automatic class name conflict resolution # should be used or not; defaults to false. # org.exolab.castor.builder.automaticConflictResolution=true
Specifies whether extra (additional) methods
should be created for collection-style fields. Set this to true
if you want your code to be more compatible with Castor JDO (or other
persistence frameworks in general).
By setting this property to true
, additional getter/setter methods
for the field in question, such as get/set by reference and set as copy methods, will
be added. In order to have these additional methods generated, please override the
following code generator property in a custom
castorbuilder.properties
as shown:
# Enables generation of extra methods for collection fields, such as get/set by # reference and set as copy. Extra methods are in addition to the usual # collection get/set methods. Set this to true if you want your code to be # more compatible with Castor JDO. # # Possible values: # - false (default) # - true org.exolab.castor.builder.extraCollectionMethods=true
As of release 1.2, Castor supports the use of Velocity-based code templates for code generation. For the time being, Castor will support two modes for code generation, i.e. the new Velocity-based and an old legacy mode. Default will be the legacy mode; this will be changed with a later release of Castor.
In order to use the new Velocity-based code generation, please
call the method setJClassPrinterType(String)
on
org.exolab.castor.builder.SourceGenerator
with a value of velocity
.
As we consider the code stable enough for a major release, we do encourage users to use the new Velocity-based mode and to provide us with (valuable) feedback.
Please note that we have changed the mechanics of changing the JClass printing type between releases 1.2 and 1.2.1.
As of release 1.2, the Castor XML code generator - if configured as shown below - now supports generation of additional methods to allow programmatic access to <xs:documentation> elements for top-level type/element definitions as follows:
public java.lang.String getXmlSchemaDocumentation(final java.lang.String source); public java.util.Map getXmlSchemaDocumentations();
In order to have these additional methods generated as shown above,
please override the following code generator property in a custom
castorbuilder.properties
as shown:
# Property specifying whether extra members/methods for extracting XML schema # documentation should be made available; defaults to false org.exolab.castor.builder.extraDocumentationMethods=true
This section defines the Castor XML binding file and describes - based upon the use of examples - how to use it.
The default binding used to generate the Java Object Model from an XML schema may not meet your expectations. For instance, the default binding doesn't deal with naming collisions that can appear because XML Schema allows an element declaration and a complexType definition to use the same name. The source generator will attempt to create two Java classes with the same qualified name. However, the latter class generated will simply overwrite the first one.
Another example of where the default source generator binding may not meet your expectations is when you want to change the default datatype binding provided by Castor or when you want to add validation rules by implementing your own validator and passing it to the Source Generator.
The binding declaration is an XML-based language that allows the user to control and tweak details about source generation for the generated classes. The aim of this section is to provide an overview of the binding file and a definition of the several XML components used to define this binding file.
A more in-depth presentation will be available soon in the Source Generator User Document (PDF).
<binding defaultBindingType = (element|type)> (include*, package*, namingXML?, elementBinding*, attributeBinding, complexTypeBinding, groupBinding) </binding>
The binding element is the root element and contains the binding information.
Table 2.3. <column> - Definitions
Name | Description | Default | Required ? |
---|---|---|---|
defaultBindingType | Controls the class creation mode
for details on the available modes. Please note that the mode
specified in this attribute will override the binding type specified
in the castorbuilder.properties file. | element | No |
<include URI = xsd:anyURI/>
This element allows you to include a binding declaration defined in another file. This allows reuse of binding files defined for various XML schemas.
Attributes of <include>
The URI of the binding file to include.
<package> name = xsd:string (namespace|schemaLocation) = xsd:string> </package>
Table 2.4. <package> - Definitions
Name | Description |
---|---|
name | A fully qualified java package name. |
namespace | An XML namespace that will be mapped to the package name defined by the name element. |
schemaLocation | A URL that locates the schema to be mapped to the package name defined by the name element. |
The targetNamespace
attribute of an XML schema
identifies the namespace in which the XML schema elements are defined. This
language namespace is defined in the generated Java source as a package
declaration. The <package/>
element allows you to define
the mapping between an XML namespace and a Java package.
Moreover, XML schema allows you to factor the definition of an XML
schema identified by a unique namespace by including several XML
schemas instances to build one XML schema using the
<xsd:include/>
element. Please make sure you understand
the difference between <xsd:include/>
and
<xsd:import/>
. <xsd:include/>
#
relies on the URI of the included XML schema. This element allows you to keep the
structure hierarchy defined in XML schema in a single generated Java
package. Thus the binding file allows you to define the mapping
between a schemaLocation
attribute and a Java package.
<namingXML> (elementName,complexTypeName,modelGroupName) </namingXML> <elementName|complexTypeName|modelGroupName> (prefix?, suffix?) = xsd:string </elementName|complexTypeName|modelGroupName>
Table 2.5. <namingXML> - Definitions
Name | Description |
---|---|
prefix | The prefix to add to the names of the generated classes. |
suffix | The suffix to append to the the names of the generated classes. |
One of the aims of the binding file is to avoid naming collisions. Indeed, XML schema allows <element>s and <complexType>s to share the same name, resulting in name collisions when generating sources. Defining a binding for each element and complexType that share the same name is not always a convenient solution (for instance the BPML XML schema and the UDDI v2.0 XML schema use the same names for top-level complexTypes and top-level elements).
The main aim of the <namingXML/>
element is to define
default prefices and suffices for the names of the classes generated for an
<element>, a <complexType> or a model group definition.
Note | |
---|---|
It is not possible to control the names of the classes generated to represent nested model groups (all, choice, and sequence). |
<elementBinding|attributeBinding|complexTypeBinding|groupBinding name = xsd:string> ((java-class|interface|member|contentMember), elementBinding*, attributeBinding*, complexTypeBinding*, groupBinding*) </elementBinding|attributeBinding|complexTypeBinding|groupBinding>
Table 2.6. <componentBinding> - Definitions
Name | Description |
---|---|
name | The name of the XML schema component for which we are defining a binding. |
These elements are the tenets of the binding file since they contain
the binding definition for an XML schema element, attribute,
complex type and model group definition. The first child element
(<java-class/>
, <interface>
,
<member>
or <contentMember/>
)
will determine the type of binding one is defining. Please note that
defining a <java-class>
binding on an XML schema
attribute will have absolutely no effect.
The binding file is written from an XML schema point of view; there are two distinct ways to define the XML schema component for which we are defining a binding.
(XPath-style) name
Embedded definitions
First we can define it through the name
attribute.
The value of the name attribute uniquely identifies the XML schema component. It can refer to the top-level component using the NCName of that component or it can use a location language based on XPath. The grammar of that language can be defined by the following BNF:
[1]Path ::= '/'LocationPath('/'LocationPath)* [2]LocationPath ::= (Complex|ModelGroup|Attribute|Element|Enumeration) [3]Complex ::= 'complexType:'(NCName) [4]ModelGroup ::= 'group:'NCName [5]Attribute ::= '@'NCName [6]Element ::= NCName [7]Enumeration ::= 'enumType':(NCName)
Please note that all values for the name
attribute
have to start with a '/'
.
The second option to identify an XML schema component is to embed its binding definition inside its parent binding definition.
Considering below XML schema fragment ...
<complexType name="fooType"> <sequence> <element name="foo" type="string" /> </sequence> </complexType>
the following binding definitions are equivalent and
identify the <element> foo
defined in the top-level
<complexType> fooType
.
<elementBinding name="/complexType:fooType/foo> <member name="MyFoo" handler="mypackage.myHandler"/> </elementBinding> <complexTypeBinding name="/fooType"> <elementBinding name="/foo> <member name="MyFoo" handler="mypackage.myHandler"/> </elementBinding> <complexTypeBinding>
<java-class name? = xsd:string package? = xsd:string final? = xsd:boolean abstract? = xsd:boolean equals? = xsd:boolean bound? = xsd:boolean (implements*,extends?) </java-class>
This element defines all the options for the class to be generated, including common properties such as class name, package name, and so on.
Attributes of <java-class>
The name of the class that will be generated.
The package of the class to be generated. if set,
this option overrides the mapping defined in the
<package/>
element.
If true, the generated class will be final.
If true, the generated class will be abstract.
If true, the generated class will implement the
equals()
and hashCode()
method.
If true, the generated class will implement bound properties, allowing property change notification.
For instance, the following binding definition instructs the source
generator to generate a class CustomTest
for a global
element named 'test', replacing the default class name Test
with CustomTest
.
<elementBinding name="/test"> <java-class name="CustomTest" final="true"/> </elementBinding>
In addition to the properties listed above, it is possible to define that the class generated will extend a class given and/or implement one or more interfaces.
For instance, the following binding definition instructs the source
generator to generate a class TestWithInterface
that
implements the interface org.castor.sample.SomeInterface
in
addition to java.io.Serializable
.
<elementBinding name="/test"> <java-class name="TestWithInterface"> <implements>org.castor.sample.SomeInterface</implements> </java-class> </elementBinding>
The subsequent binding definition instructs the source generator to
generate a class TestWithExtendsAndInterface
that
implements the interface org.castor.sample.SomeInterface
in
addition to java.io.Serializable
, and extends from a
(probably abstract) base class SomeAbstractBaseClass
.
<elementBinding name="/test"> <java-class name="TestWithExtendsAndInterface"> <extends>org.castor.sample.SomeAbstractBaseClass</extends> <implements>org.castor.sample.SomeInterface</implements> </java-class> </elementBinding>
The generated class SomeAbstractBaseClass
will have a class
signature as shown below:
... public class TestWithExtendsAndInterface extends SomeAbstractBaseClass implements SomeInterface, java.io.Serializable { ...
<member name? = xsd:string java-type? = xsd:string wrapper? = xsd:boolean handler? = xsd:string visibility? = (public|protected|private) collection? = (array|vector|arraylist|hashtable|collection|odmg|set|map|sortedset) validator? = xsd:string/>
This element represents the binding for class member. It allows the definition of its name and java type as well as a custom implementation of FieldHandler to help the Marshaling framework in handling that member. Defining a validator is also possible. The names given for the validator and the fieldHandler must be fully qualified.
Table 2.7. <member> - Definitions
Name | Description |
---|---|
name | The name of the class member that will be generated. |
java-type | Fully qualified name of the java type. |
wrapper | If true, a wrapper object will be generated in case the Java type is a java primitive. |
handler | Fully qualified name of the custom FieldHandler to use. |
collection | If the schema component can occur more than once then this attribute allows specifying the collection to use to represent the component in Java. |
validator | Fully qualified name of the FieldValidator to use. |
visibility |
A custom visibility of the content class member generated,
with the default being public .
|
For instance, the following binding definition:
<elementBinding name="/root/members"> <member collection="set"/> </elementBinding>
instructs the source generator to generate -- within a class
Root
-- a Java member named
members
using the
collection type java.util.Set
instead of the default
java.util.List
:
public class Root { private java.util.Set members; ... }
The following (slightly amended) binding element:
<elementBinding name="/root/members"> <member name="memberSet" collection="set"/> </elementBinding>
instructs the source generator to generate -- again within a class
Root
-- a Java member named
memberSet
(of the same
collection type as in the previous example), overriding the name of
the member as specified in the XML schema:
public class Root { private java.util.Set memberSet; ... }
<contentMember name? = xsd:string visiblity? = (public|protected|private)
This element represents the binding for content class member generated as a result of a mixed mode declaration of a complex type definition. It allows the definition of its name and its visibility
The name of the class member that will be
generated, overriding the default name of
_content
.
A custom visibility of the content class member generated, with
the default being
public
.
For a complex type definition declared to be mixed such as follows ...
<complexType name="RootType" mixed="true"> <sequence> ... >/sequence> >/complexType>
... the following binding definition ...
<elementBinding name="/complexType:RootType"> <contentMember name="customContentMember"/> </elementBinding>
instructs the source generator to generate -- within a class
RootType
-- a Java member named
customContentMember
of type
java.lang.String
:
public class RootType { private java.util.String customContentMember; ... }
<enumBinding> (enumDef) </enumBinding> <enumDef> (enumClassName = xsd:string, enumMember*) </enumDef> <enumMember> (name = xsd:string, value = xsd:string) </enumMember>
The <enumBinding>
element allows more control on the
code generated for type-safe enumerations, which are used to
represent an XML Schema <simpleType>
enumeration.
For instance, given the following XML schema enumeration definition:
<xs:simpleType name="durationUnitType"> <xs:restriction base='xs:string'> <xs:enumeration value='Y' /> <xs:enumeration value='M' /> <xs:enumeration value='D' /> <xs:enumeration value='h' /> <xs:enumeration value='m' /> <xs:enumeration value='s' /> </xs:restriction> </simpleType>
the Castor code generator would generate code where the default
naming convention used during the generation would overwrite the
first constant definition for value 'M
' with the one
generated for value 'm
'.
The following binding definition defines -- through the means of
an <enumMember>
definition for the enumeration
value 'M
' -- a special binding for this value:
<enumBinding name="/enumType:durationUnitType"> <enum-def> <enumMember> <value>M</value> <javaName>CUSTOM_M</javaName> </enumMember> </enum-def> </enumBinding>
and instructs the source generator to generate -- within a class
DurationUnitType
-- a constant definition named
CUSTOM_M
for the enumeration value M
.
The <javadoc>
element allows one to enter the
necessary JavaDoc representing the generated classes or members.
As mentioned previously, you use a binding file for two main reasons:
To customize the Java code generated
To avoid class generation conflicts.
For the latter case, you'll (often) notice such collisions by looking at generated Java code that frequently does not compile. Whilst this is relatively easy for small(ish) XML schema(s), this task gets tedious for more elaborate XML schemas. To ease your life in the context of this 'collision detection', the Castor XML code generator provides you with a few advanced features. The following sections cover these features in detail.
During code generation, the Castor XML code generator will run into situations where a class (about to be generated, and as such about to be written to the file system) will overwrite an already existing class. This, for example, is the case if within one XML schema there's two (local) element definitions within separate complex type definitions with the same name. In such a case, Castor will emit warning messages that inform the user that a class will be overwritten.
As of release 1.1, the Castor XML code generator supports two
reporting modes that allow different levels of control in the event
of such collisions, warnViaConsoleDialog
and informViaLog
mode.
Table 2.8. <column> - Definitions
Mode | Description | Since |
---|---|---|
warnViaConsoleDialog | Emits warning messages to stdout and ask the
users whether to continue. | 0.9 |
informViaLog | Emits warning messages only via the standard logger. | 1.1 |
Please select the reporting mode of your choice according to your needs, the
default being warnViaConsoleDialog
. Please note that the
informViaLog
reporting mode should be the preferred choice
when using the XML code generator in an automated environment.
In general, the warning messages produced are very useful in assisting
you in your creation of the binding file, as shown in below example
for the warnViaConsoleDialog
mode:
Warning: A class name generation conflict has occurred between element '/Data/OrderReceipt/LineItem' and element '/Data/PurchaseOrder/LineItem'. Please use a Binding file to solve this problem.Continue anyway [not recommended] (y|n|?)y Warning: A class name generation conflict has occurred between element '/Data/OrderReceipt/LineItem' and element '/Data/PurchaseOrder/LineItem'. Please use a Binding file to solve this problem.Continue anyway [not recommended] (y|n|?)y Warning: A class name generation conflict has occurred between element '/Data/OrderReceipt/LineItem' and element '/Data/PurchaseOrder/LineItem'. Please use a Binding file to solve this problem.Continue anyway [not recommended] (y|n|?)y Warning: A class name generation conflict has occurred between element 'complexType:ReceiptLineItemType/Sku' and element 'complexType:LineItemType/Sku'. Please use a Binding file to solve this problem.Continue anyway [not recommended] (y|n|?)y Warning: A class name generation conflict has occurred between element 'complexType:ReceiptLineItemType/Sku' and element 'complexType:LineItemType/Sku'. Please use a Binding file to solve this problem.Continue anyway [not recommended] (y|n|?)y Warning: A class name generation conflict has occurred between element 'complexType:ReceiptLineItemType/Sku' and element 'complexType:LineItemType/Sku'. Please use a Binding file to solve this problem.Continue anyway [not recommended] (y|n|?)y
As already mentioned, this mode emits warning messages to stdout
, and
asks you whether you want to continue with the code generation or not. This
allows for very fine grained control over the extent of the code generation.
Please note that there is several setter methods on the
org.exolab.castor.builder.SourceGenerator
that allow you to fine-tune
various settings for this reporting mode. Genuinely, we believe that for
automated code generation through either Ant or Maven, the new informViaLog
is better suited for these needs.
As of Castor 1.1.1, support has been added to the Castor XML code generator for a (nearly) automatic conflict resolution. To enable this new mode, please override the following property in your custom property file as shown below:
# Specifies whether automatic class name conflict resolution # should be used or not; defaults to false. # org.exolab.castor.builder.automaticConflictResolution=true
As a result of enabling automatic conflict resolution, Castor will try to resolve such name collisions automatically, using one of the following two strategies:
Table 2.9. <column> - Definitions
Name | Description | Since | Default |
---|---|---|---|
xpath | Prepends an XPATH fragment to make the suggested Java name unique. | 1.1.1 | Yes |
type | Appends type information to the suggested Java name. | 1.1.1 | No |
For selecting one of the two strategies during XML code generation, please see the documentation for the following code artifacts:
setClassNameConflictResolver
on org.exolab.castor.builder.SourceGenerator
org.exolab.castor.builder.SourceGeneratorMain"
In order to explain the modus operandi of these two modes, please
assume two complex type definitions AType
and BType
in an XML schema, with both of them defining a local element named c
.
<xs:complexType name="AType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="c" type="CType1" /> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="BType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="c" type="CType2" /> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType>
Without automatic collision resolution enabled, Castor will create
identically named classes C.java
for both members, and one
will overwrite the other. Please note the different types for the
two c
element definitions, which requires two class files to be
generated in order not to lose this information.
This strategy will prepend an XPATH fragment to the default Java name as derived during code generation, the default name (frequently) being the name of the XML schema artifact, e.g. the element name of the complex type name. The XPATH fragment being prepended is minimal in the sense that the resulting rooted XPATH is unique for the XML schema artifact being processed.
With automatic collision resolution enabled and the strategy 'XPATH' selected, Castor will create the following two classes, simply prepending the name of the complex type to the default element name:
ATypeC.java
BTypeC.java
This strategy will append 'type' information to the default Java name as derived during code generation, the default name (frequently) being the name of the XML schema artifact, e.g. the element name of the complex type name.
With automatic collision resolution enabled and
the strategy 'TYPE' selected, Castor will create the following two
classes, simply appending the name of the complex type to the default
element name (with a default 'By
' inserted):
CByCType1.java
CByCType2.java
To override the default 'By
' inserted between the default
element name and the type information, please override the following
property in your custom property file as shown below:
# Property specifying the 'string' used in type strategy to be inserted # between the actual element name and the type name (during automatic class name # conflict resolution); defaults to 'By'. org.exolab.castor.builder.automaticConflictResolutionTypeSuffix=ByBy
The Castor XML code generator, with automatic collision resolution enabled, is capable of resolving the following collisions automatically:
Name of local element definition same as name of a global element
Name of local element definition same as name of another local element definition.
Note | |
---|---|
Please note that collision resolution for a local to local collision will only take place for the second local element definition encountered (and subsequent ones). |
An alternative to using the command line as shown in the previous section, the Castor Source Generator Ant Task can be used to call the source generator for class generation. The only requirement is that the castor-<version>-codegen-antask.jar must additionally be on the CLASSPATH.
As shown in the subsequent table, there's multiple ways of specifying the input for the Castor code generator. At least one input source has to be specified.
Table 2.10. <column> - Definitions
Attribute | Description | Required | Since |
---|---|---|---|
file | The XML schema, to be used as input for the source code generator. | No. | - |
dir | Sets a directory such that all XML schemas in this directory will have code generated for them. | No | - |
schemaURL | URL to an XML schema, to be used as input for the source code generator. | No. | 1.2 |
In addition, a nested <fileset> can be specified as the source of input. Please refer to the samples shown below.
Please find below the complete list of parameters that can be set on the Castor source generator to fine-tune the execution behavior.
Table 2.11. Ant task properties
Attribute | Description | Required | Since |
---|---|---|---|
package | The default package to be used during source code generation. | No; if not given, all classes will be placed in the root package. | - |
todir | The destination directory to be used during source code generation. In this directory all generated Java classes will be placed. | No | - |
bindingfile | A Castor source generator binding file. | No | - |
lineseparator | Defines whether to use Unix- or Windows- or Mac-style line separators during source code generation. Possible values are: 'unix', 'win' or 'mac'. | No; if not set, system property 'line.separator' is used instead. | - |
types | Defines what collection types to use (Java 1 vs. Java 2). Possible values: 'vector', 'arraylist' (aka 'j2') or 'odmg'. | No; if not set, the default collection used will be Java 1 type | - |
verbose | Whether to output any logging messages as emitted by the source generator | No | - |
warnings | Whether to suppress any warnings as otherwise emitted by the source generator | No | - |
nodesc | If used, instructs the source generator not to generate *Descriptor classes. | No | - |
generateMapping | If used, instructs the source generator to (additionally) generate a mapping file. | No | - |
nomarshal | If specified, instructs the source generator not to create (un)marshalling methods within the Java classes generated. | No | - |
caseInsensitive | If used, instructs the source generator to generate code for enumerated type lookup in a case insensitive manner. | No | - |
sax1 | If used, instructs the source generator to generate SAX-1 compliant code. | No | - |
generateImportedSchemas | If used, instructs the source generator to generate code for imported schemas as well. | No | - |
nameConflictStrategy | If used, sets the name conflict strategy to use during XML code generation;
possible values are 'warnViaConsoleDialog ' and
'informViaLog '. | No | - |
properties | Location of file defining a set of properties to be used during source code
generation. This overrides the default mechanisms of configuring the source
generator through a castorbuilder.properties (that has to be
placed on the CLASSPATH) | No | - |
automaticConflictStrategy | If used, sets the name conflict resolution strategy used during XML
code generation; possible values are 'type ' and 'xpath '
(default being 'xpath '). | No | - |
jClassPrinterType | Sets the mode for printing JClass instances during XML
code generation; possible values are 'standard ' and 'velocity '
(default being 'standard '). | No | 1.2.1 |
generateJdoDescriptors | If used, instructs the source generator to generate JDO class descriptors as well; default is false. | No | 1.3 |
resourceDestination |
Sets the destination directory for (generated) resources,
e.g. .castor.cdr files.
| No | 1.3.1 |
Below is an example of how to use this task from within an Ant target definition named 'castor:gen:src':
<target name="castor:gen:src" depends="init" description="Generate Java source files from XSD."> <taskdef name="castor-srcgen" classname="org.castor.anttask.CastorCodeGenTask" classpathref="castor.class.path" /> <mkdir dir="generated" /> <castor-srcgen file="src/schema/sample.xsd" todir="generated-source" package="org.castor.example.schema" types="j2" warnings="true" /> </target>
Below is the same sample as above, this time using the url attribute as the source of input instead:
<target name="castor:gen:src" depends="init" description="Generate Java source files from XSD."> <taskdef name="castor-srcgen" classname="org.castor.anttask.CastorCodeGenTask" classpathref="castor.class.path" /> <mkdir dir="generated" /> <castor-srcgen schemaURL="http://some.domain/some/path/sample.xsd" todir="generated-source" package="org.castor.example.schema" types="j2" warnings="true" /> </target>
Below is the same sample as above, this time using the url attribute as the source of input instead:
<target name="castor:gen:src" depends="init" description="Generate Java source files from XSD."> <taskdef name="castor-srcgen" classname="org.castor.anttask.CastorCodeGenTask" classpathref="castor.class.path" /> <mkdir dir="generated" /> <castor-srcgen todir="generated-source" package="org.castor.example.schema" types="j2" warnings="true" > <fileset dir="${basedir}/src/schema"> <include name="**/*.xsd"/> </fileset> </castor-srcgen> </target>
For those of you working with Maven 2 instead of Ant, the Maven 2 plugin for Castor can be used to integrate source code generation from XML schemas with the Castor XML code generator as part of the standard Maven build life-cycle. The following sections show how to configure the Maven 2 Castor plugin and hwo to instruct Maven 2 to generate sources from your XML schemas.
To be able to start source code generation from XML schema from within Maven, you will have to configure the Maven 2 Castor plugin as follows:
<plugin> <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId> <artifactId>castor-maven-plugin</artifactId> <version>2.0</version> </plugin>
Above configuration will trigger source generation using the default
values as explained at the
Castor plugin page,
assuming that the XML schema(s) are located at src/main/castor
, and code will
be saved at target/generated-sources/castor
. When generating sources
for multiple schemas at the same time, you can put namespace to
package mappings into src/main/castor/castorbuilder.properties
.
To e.g. change some of these default locations, please add a <configuration> section to the plugin configuration as follows:
<plugin> <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId> <artifactId>castor-maven-plugin</artifactId> <version>2.0</version> <configuration> <schema>src/main/resources/org/exolab/castor/builder/binding/binding.xsd</schema> <packaging>org.exolab.castor.builder.binding</packaging> <properties>src/main/resources/org/exolab/castor/builder/binding.generation.properties</properties> </configuration> </plugin>
Details on the available configuration properties can be found here.
By default, the Maven Castor plugin has been built and tested against a particular version of Castor. To switch to a newer version of Castor (not the plugin itself), please use a <dependencies> section as shown below to point the plugin to e.g. a newer version of Castor:
<plugin> <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId> <artifactId>castor-maven-plugin</artifactId> <version>2.0</version> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>org.codehaus.castor</groupId> <artifactId>castor</artifactId> <version>1.3.1-SNAPSHOT</version> </dependency> </dependencies> </plugin>
To integrate source code generation from XML schema into your standard build life-cycle, you will have to add an <executions> section to your standard plugin configuration as follows:
<plugin> <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId> <artifactId>castor-maven-plugin</artifactId> <version>2.0</version> <executions> <execution> <goals> <goal>generate</goal> </goals> </execution> </executions> </plugin>
java org.exolab.castor.builder.SourceGeneratorMain -i foo-schema.xsd \
-package com.xyz
This will generate a set of source files from the the XML Schema
foo-schema.xsd
and place them in the package
com.xyz
.
To compile the generated classes, simply run javac or your favorite compiler:
javac com/xyz/*.java
Created class will have marshal
and
unmarshal
methods which are used to
go back and forth between XML and an Object instance.
The source code generator has a number of different options which may
be set. Some of these are done using the command line and others are
done using a properties file located by default at
org/exolab/castor/builder/castorbuilder.properties
.
There's more than one way of specifying the input for the Castor code generator. At least one input source must be specified.
Table 2.12. Input sources
Option | Args | Description | Version |
---|---|---|---|
i | filename | The input XML Schema file | - |
is | URL | URL of an XML Schema | 1.2 and newer |
Table 2.13. Other command line options
Option | Arguments | Description | Optional? |
---|---|---|---|
-package | package-name | The package for the generated source. | Optional |
-dest | path | The destination directory in which to create the generated source | Optional |
-line-separator | unix | mac | win | Sets the line separator style for the desired platform. This is useful if you are generating source on one platform, but will be compiling/modifying on another platform. | Optional |
-types | type-factory | Sets which type factory to use. This is useful if you want JDK 1.2 collections instead of JDK 1.1 or if you want to pass in your own FieldInfoFactory (see Section 2.5.3.2.2.1, “Collection Types”). | Optional |
-h | Shows the help/usage information. | Optional | |
-f | Forces the source generator to suppress all non-fatal errors, such as overwriting pre-existing files. | Optional | |
-nodesc | Do not generate the class descriptors | Optional | |
-gen-mapping | (Additionally) Generate a mapping file. | Optional | |
-nomarshall | Do not generate the marshaling framework methods (marshal, unmarshal, validate) | Optional | |
-testable | Generate the extra methods used by the CTF (Castor Testing Framework) | Optional | |
-sax1 | Generate marshaling methods that use the SAX1 framework (default is false). | Optional | |
-binding-file | <<binding file name>>. | Configures the use of a Binding File to allow finely-grained control of the generated classes | Optional |
-generateImportedSchemas | Generates sources for imported XML Schemas in addition to the schema provided on the command line (default is false). | Optional | |
-case-insensitive | The generated classes will use a case insensitive method for looking up enumerated type values. | Optional | |
-verbose | Enables extra diagnostic output from the source generator | Optional | |
-nameConflictStrategy | <<conflict strategy name>> | Sets the name conflict strategy to use during XML code generation | Optional |
-fail | Instructs the source generator to fail on the first error. When you are trying to figure out what is failing during source generation, this option will help. | Optional | |
-classPrinter | <<JClass printing mode>>. | Specifies the JClass printing mode to use during XML code generation; possible
values arestandard (default) and velocity ; if no value
is specified, the default mode is standard . | Optional |
-gen-jdo-desc | (Additionally) generate JDO class descriptors. | Optional | |
-resourcesDestination | <destination> | An (optional) destination for (generated) resources | Optional |
The source code generator has the ability to use the following
types of collections when generating source code, using the
-type
option:
Table 2.14. Collection types
Option value | Type | Default |
---|---|---|
-types j1 | Java 1.1 | java.util.Vector |
-type j2 | Java 1.2 | java.util.Collection |
-types odmg | ODMG 3.0 | odmg.DArray |
The Java class name shown in above table indicates the default collection type that will be emitted during generation.
You can also write your own FieldInfoFactory to handle specific collection types. All you have to do is to pass in the fully qualified name of that FieldInfoFactory as follows:
-types com.personal.MyCoolFactory
Tip | |
---|---|
For additional information about the Source Generator and its options, you can download the Source Generator User Document (PDF). Please note that the use of a binding file is not dicussed in that document. |
Castor XML supports the W3C XML Schema 1.0 Second Edition Recommendation document (10/28/2004) The Schema Object Model (located in the package org.exolab.castor.xml.schema) provides an in-memory representation of a given XML schema whereas the XML code generator provides a binding between XML schema data types and structures into the corresponding ones in Java.
The Castor Schema Object Model can read (org.exolab.castor.xml.schema.reader) and write (org.exolab.castor.xml.schema.writer) an XML Schema as defined by the W3C recommandation. It allows you to create and manipulate an in-memory view of an XML Schema.
The Castor Schema Object Model supports the W3C XML Schema recommendation with no limitation. However the Source Generator does currently not offer a one to one mapping from an XML Schema component to a Java component for every XML Schema components; some limitations exist. The aim of the following sections is to provide a list of supported features in the Source Generator. Please keep in mind that the Castor Schema Object Model again can handle any XML Schema without limitations.
Some Schema types do not have a corresponding type in Java. Thus the
Source Generator uses Castor implementation of these specific types
(located in the org.exolab.castor.types package).
For instance the duration
type is implemented directly in
Castor. Remember that the representation of XML Schema datatypes does
not try to fit the W3C XML Schema specifications exactly. The aim is to
map an XML Schema type to the Java type that is the best fit to the XML
Schema type.
You will find next a list of the supported XML Schema data types and structures in the Source Code Generator. For a more detailed support of XML Schema structure and more information on the Schema Object Model, please refer to Source Generator User Document (PDF).
The following is a list of the supported datatypes with the corresponding facets and the Java mapping type.
Table 2.15. Supported primitive data types
XML Schema Type | Supported Facets | Java mapping type |
---|---|---|
anyURI | enumeration | java.lang.String |
base64Binary | byte[] | |
boolean | pattern |
boolean or java.lang.Boolean [a]
|
date | enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, pattern, whitespace[b] | org.exolab.castor.types.Date |
dateTime | enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, pattern, whitespace[b] | java.util.Date |
decimal | totalDigits, fractionDigits, pattern, whiteSpace, enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, whitespace[b] | java.math.BigDecimal |
double | enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, pattern, whitespace[b] |
double or java.lang.Double [c]
|
duration | enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, pattern, whitespace[b] | org.exolab.castor.types.Duration |
float | enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, pattern, whitespace[b] |
float or java.lang.Float [c]
|
gDay | enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, pattern, whitespace[b] | org.exolab.castor.types.GDay |
gMonth | enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, pattern, whitespace[b] | org.exolab.castor.types.GMonth |
gMonthDay | enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, pattern, whitespace[b] | org.exolab.castor.types.GMonthDay |
gYear | enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, pattern, whitespace[b] | org.exolab.castor.types.GYear |
gYearMonth | enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, pattern, whitespace[b] | org.exolab.castor.types.GYearMonth |
hexBinary | byte[] | |
QName | length, minLength, maxLength, pattern, enumeration | java.lang.String |
string | length, minLength, maxLength, pattern, enumeration, whiteSpace | java.lang.String |
time | enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, pattern, whitespace[b] | org.exolab.castor.types.Time |
[a] For the various numerical types, the
default behavior is to generate primitive types. However, if the
use of wrappers is enabled by the following line in the
[b] For the date/time and numeric types, the only supported value for whitespace is "collapse". |
Table 2.16. Supported derived data types
Type | Supported Facets | Java mapping type |
---|---|---|
byte | totalDigits, fractionDigits[a], pattern, enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, whitespace[b] |
byte /java.lang.Byte
[c]
|
ENTITY | Not implemented | |
ENTITIES | Not implemented | |
ID | enumeration | java.lang.String |
IDREF | java.lang.Object | |
IDREFS | java.util.Vector of java.lang.Object | |
int | totalDigits, fractionDigits[a], pattern, enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, whitespace[b] |
int /java.lang.Integer [c]
|
integer | totalDigits, fractionDigits[a], pattern, enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, whitespace[b] |
long /java.lang.Long [c]
|
language | length, minLength, maxLength, pattern, enumeration, whiteSpace |
treated as a xsd:string [d]
|
long | totalDigits, fractionDigits[a], pattern, enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, whitespace[b] |
long /java.lang.Long [c]
|
Name | Not implemented | |
NCName | enumeration | java.lang.String |
negativeInteger | totalDigits, fractionDigits[], pattern, enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, whitespace[b] |
long /java.lang.Long [c]
|
NMTOKEN | enumeration, length, maxlength, minlength | java.lang.String |
NMTOKENS | java.util.Vector of java.lang.String | |
NOTATION | Not implemented | |
nonNegativeInteger | totalDigits, fractionDigits[a], pattern, enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, whitespace[b] |
long /java.lang.Long [c]
|
nonPositiveInteger | totalDigits, fractionDigits[a], pattern, enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, whitespace[b] |
long /java.lang.Long [c]
|
normalizedString | enumeration, length, minLength, maxLength, pattern | java.lang.String |
positiveInteger | totalDigits, fractionDigits[a], pattern, enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, whitespace[b] |
long /java.lang.Long [c]
|
short | totalDigits, fractionDigits[a], pattern, enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, whitespace[b] |
short /java.lang.Short [c]
|
token | length, minLength, maxLength, pattern, enumeration, whiteSpace |
treated as a xsd:string [d],
|
unsignedByte | totalDigits, fractionDigits[a], maxExclusive, minExclusive, maxInclusive, minInclusive, pattern, whitespace[b] |
short /java.lang.Short [c]
|
unsignedInt | totalDigits, fractionDigits[a], maxExclusive, minExclusive, maxInclusive, minInclusive, pattern, whitespace[b] |
long /java.lang.Long [c]
|
unsignedLong | totalDigits, fractionDigits[a], pattern, enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, whitespace[b] | java.math.BigInteger |
unsignedShort | totalDigits, fractionDigits[a], pattern, enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, whitespace[b] |
int or java.lang.Integer [c]
|
[a] For the integral types, the only allowed value for fractionDigits is 0. [b] For the date/time and numeric types, the only supported value for whitespace is "collapse". [c] For the various numerical types, the
default behavior is to generate primitive types. However, if the
use of wrappers is enabled by the following line in the
[d]
Currently, |
Supporting XML schema structures is a constant work. The main structures are already supported with some limitations. The following will give you a rough list of the supported structures. For a more detailed support of XML Schema structure in the Source Generator or in the Schema Object Model, please refer to Source Generator User Document (PDF).
Supported schema components:
Attribute declaration (<attribute>
)
Element declaration (<element>
)
Complex type definition (<complexType>
)
Attribute group definition (<attributeGroup>
)
Model group definition (<group>
)
Model group (<all>
, <choice>
and <sequence>
)
Annotation (<annotation>
)
Wildcard (<any>
)
Simple type definition (<simpleType>
)
Grouping support covers both model group definitions
(<group>
) and model groups
(<all>
, <choice>
and
<sequence>
). In this section
we will label as a 'nested group' any model group whose first parent
is another model group.
For each top-level model group definition, a class is generated either when using the 'element' mapping property or the 'type' one.
If a group -- nested or not -- appears to have maxOccurs > 1
, then a class is generated to represent the items contained in the group.
For each nested group, a class is generated. The name of the
generated class will follow this naming convention:
Name,Compositor+,Counter?
where
'Name' is name of the top-level component (element, complexType or group).
'Compositor' is the compositor of the nested group. For
instance, if a 'choice' is nested inside a sequence, the value
of Compositor will be SequenceChoice
('Sequence'+'Choice').
Note: if the 'choice' is inside a Model Group and that Model
Group parent is a Model Group Definition or a
complexType then the value of'Compositor' will be only 'Choice'.
'Counter' is a number that prevents naming collision.
In this section we illustrate the use of the XML code generator by discussing the classes generated from given XML schemas. The XML code generator is going to be used with the “java class mapping” property set to element (default value).
The input file is the schema file given with the XML code generator example in the distribution of Castor (under /src/examples/SourceGenerator/invoice.xsd).
<?xml version="1.0"?> <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" targetNamespace="http://castor.exolab.org/Test/Invoice"> <xsd:annotation> <xsd:documentation> This is a test XML Schema for Castor XML. </xsd:documentation> </xsd:annotation> <!-- A simple representation of an invoice. This is simply an example and not meant to be an exact or even complete representation of an invoice. --> <xsd:element name="invoice"> <xsd:annotation> <xsd:documentation> A simple representation of an invoice </xsd:documentation> </xsd:annotation> <xsd:complexType> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element name="ship-to"> <xsd:complexType> <xsd:group ref="customer" /> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:element> <xsd:element ref="item" maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="1" /> <xsd:element ref="shipping-method" /> <xsd:element ref="shipping-date" /> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:element> <!-- Description of a customer --> <xsd:group name="customer"> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element name="name" type="xsd:string" /> <xsd:element ref="address" /> <xsd:element name="phone" type="TelephoneNumberType" /> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:group> <!-- Description of an item --> <xsd:element name="item"> <xsd:complexType> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element name="Quantity" type="xsd:integer" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" /> <xsd:element name="Price" type="PriceType" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" /> </xsd:sequence> <xsd:attributeGroup ref="ItemAttributes" /> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:element> <!-- Shipping Method --> <xsd:element name="shipping-method"> <xsd:complexType> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element name="carrier" type="xsd:string" /> <xsd:element name="option" type="xsd:string" /> <xsd:element name="estimated-delivery" type="xsd:duration" /> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:element> <!-- Shipping date --> <xsd:element name="shipping-date"> <xsd:complexType> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element name="date" type="xsd:date" /> <xsd:element name="time" type="xsd:time" /> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:element> <!-- A simple U.S. based Address structure --> <xsd:element name="address"> <xsd:annotation> <xsd:documentation> Represents a U.S. Address </xsd:documentation> </xsd:annotation> <xsd:complexType> <xsd:sequence> <!-- street address 1 --> <xsd:element name="street1" type="xsd:string" /> <!-- optional street address 2 --> <xsd:element name="street2" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0" /> <!-- city--> <xsd:element name="city" type="xsd:string" /> <!-- state code --> <xsd:element name="state" type="stateCodeType" /> <!-- zip-code --> <xsd:element ref="zip-code" /> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:element> <!-- A U.S. Zip Code --> <xsd:element name="zip-code"> <xsd:simpleType> <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string"> <xsd:pattern value="[0-9]{5}(-[0-9]{4})?" /> </xsd:restriction> </xsd:simpleType> </xsd:element> <!-- State Code obviously not a valid state code....but this is just an example and I don't feel like creating all the valid ones. --> <xsd:simpleType name="stateCodeType"> <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string"> <xsd:pattern value="[A-Z]{2}" /> </xsd:restriction> </xsd:simpleType> <!-- Telephone Number --> <xsd:simpleType name="TelephoneNumberType"> <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string"> <xsd:length value="12" /> <xsd:pattern value="[0-9]{3}-[0-9]{3}-[0-9]{4}" /> </xsd:restriction> </xsd:simpleType> <!-- Cool price type --> <xsd:simpleType name="PriceType"> <xsd:restriction base="xsd:decimal"> <xsd:fractionDigits value="2" /> <xsd:totalDigits value="5" /> <xsd:minInclusive value="1" /> <xsd:maxInclusive value="100" /> </xsd:restriction> </xsd:simpleType> <!-- The attributes for an Item --> <xsd:attributeGroup name="ItemAttributes"> <xsd:attribute name="Id" type="xsd:ID" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" /> <xsd:attribute name="InStock" type="xsd:boolean" default="false" /> <xsd:attribute name="Category" type="xsd:string" use="required" /> </xsd:attributeGroup> </xsd:schema>
The structure of this schema is simple: it is composed of a
top-level element which is a complexType with references to
other elements inside. This schema represents a simple
invoice: an invoice is a customer (customer
top-level
group), an article (item
element), a shipping method
(shipping-method
element) and a shipping date
(shipping-date
element). Notice that the ship-to
element
uses a reference to an address
element. This address
element is a top-level element that contains a reference to
a non-top-level element (the zip-cod
element). At the end
of the schema we have two simpleTypes for representing a
telephone number and a price. The Source Generator is used
with the element
property set for class creation
so a class is going to be generated for all top-level elements. No classes
are going to be generated for complexTypes and simpleTypes since the
simpleType is not an enumeration.
To summarize, we can expect 7 classes : Invoice
, Customer
,
Address
, Item
, ShipTo
, ShippingMethod
and ShippingDate
and the 7 corresponding class descriptors. Note
that a class is generated for the top-level group customer
To run the source generator and create the source from the
invoice.xsd
file in a package test
, we just call
in the command line:
java -cp %CP% org.exolab.castor.builder.SourceGeneratorMain -i invoice.xsd -package test
To simplify this example we now focus on the item
element.
<!-- Description of an item --> <xsd:element name="item"> <xsd:complexType> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element name="Quantity" type="xsd:integer" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" /> <xsd:element name="Price" type="PriceType" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" /> </xsd:sequence> <xsd:attributeGroup ref="ItemAttributes" /> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:element> <!-- Cool price type --> <xsd:simpleType name="PriceType"> <xsd:restriction base="xsd:decimal"> <xsd:fractionDigits value="2" /> <xsd:totalDigits value="5" /> <xsd:minInclusive value="1" /> <xsd:maxInclusive value="100" /> </xsd:restriction> </xsd:simpleType> <!-- The attributes for an Item --> <xsd:attributeGroup name="ItemAttributes"> <xsd:attribute name="Id" type="xsd:ID" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" /> <xsd:attribute name="InStock" type="xsd:boolean" default="false" /> <xsd:attribute name="Category" type="xsd:string" use="required" /> </xsd:attributeGroup>
To represent an Item
object, we need to know its Id
, the
Quantity
ordered and the Price
for one item. So we can
expect to find a least three private variables: a string for
the Id
element, an int
for the quantity
element (see the
section on XML Schema support if you want to see the mapping
between a W3C XML Schema type and a java type), but what type
for the Price
element?
While processing the Price
element, Castor is going to process the type of Price
i.e.
the simpleType PriceType
which base is decimal
. Since
derived types are automatically mapped to parent types and
W3C XML Schema decimal
type is mapped to a
java.math.BigDecimal
, the price element will be a
java.math.BigDecimal
. Another private variable is created
for quantity
: quantity is mapped to a primitive java type,
so a boolean has_quantity
is created for monitoring the
state of the quantity variable. The rest of the code is the
getter/setter methods and the Marshalling framework
specific methods. Please find below the complete Item
class
(with Javadoc comments stripped off):
/** * This class was automatically generated with * Castor 1.0.4, * using an XML Schema. */ package test; public class Item implements java.io.Serializable { //--------------------------/ //- Class/Member Variables -/ //--------------------------/ private java.lang.String _id; private int _quantity; /** * keeps track of state for field: _quantity */ private boolean _has_quantity; private java.math.BigDecimal _price; //----------------/ //- Constructors -/ //----------------/ public Item() { super(); } //-- test.Item() //-----------/ //- Methods -/ //-----------/ public java.lang.String getId() { return this._id; $ } //-- java.lang.String getId() public java.math.BigDecimal getPrice() { return this._price; } //-- java.math.BigDecimal getPrice() public int getQuantity() { return this._quantity; } //-- int getQuantity() public boolean hasQuantity() { return this._has_quantity; } //-- boolean hasQuantity() public boolean isValid() { try { validate(); } catch (org.exolab.castor.xml.ValidationException vex) { return false; } return true; } //-- boolean isValid() public void marshal(java.io.Writer out) throws org.exolab.castor.xml.MarshalException,org.exolab.castor.xml.ValidationException { Marshaller.marshal(this, out); } //-- void marshal(java.io.Writer) public void marshal(org.xml.sax.DocumentHandler handler) throws org.exolab.castor.xml.MarshalException, org.exolab.castor.xml.ValidationException { Marshaller.marshal(this, handler); } //-- void marshal(org.xml.sax.DocumentHandler) public void setId(java.lang.String _id) { this._id = _id; } //-- void setId(java.lang.String) public void setPrice(java.math.BigDecimal _price) { this._price = _price; } //-- void setPrice(java.math.BigDecimal) public void setQuantity(int _quantity) { this._quantity = _quantity; this._has_quantity = true; } //-- void setQuantity(int) public static test.Item unmarshal(java.io.Reader reader) throws org.exolab.castor.xml.MarshalException,org.exolab.castor.xml.ValidationException { return (test.Item) Unmarshaller.unmarshal(test.Item.class, reader); } //-- test.Item unmarshal(java.io.Reader) public void validate() throws org.exolab.castor.xml.ValidationException { org.exolab.castor.xml.Validator.validate(this, null); } //-- void validate() }
The ItemDescriptor class is a bit more complex. This class is containing inner classes which are the XML field descriptors for the different components of an ‘Item’ element i.e. id, quantity and price.
In this section, we focus on the 'invoice' element as shown again below:
<xsd:element name="invoice"> <xsd:complexType> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element name="ship-to"> <xsd:complexType> <xsd:group ref="customer" /> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:element> <xsd:element ref="item" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> <xsd:element ref="shipping-method" /> <xsd:element ref="shipping-date" /> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:element>
Amongst other things, an <invoice>
is made up of at least
one, but potentially many <item>
elements. The Castor XML code
generator creates a Java collection named 'itemList' for this
unbounded element declaration, of type java.util.List
if the scode generator is used with the 'arraylist
'
field factory.
private java.util.List _itemList;
If the 'j1
' field factory is used, this will be replaced
with ...
private java.util.Vector _itemList;
The complete class as generated (with irrelevant code
parts removed) in 'j2
' (aka 'arraylist
')
mode is shown below:
public class Invoice implements java.io.Serializable { ... private java.util.List _itemList; ... public Invoice() { super(); this._itemList = new java.util.ArrayList(); } //-- xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Invoice() ... public void addItem(xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item vItem) throws java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException { this._itemList.add(vItem); } //-- void addItem(xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item) public void addItem(int index, xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item vItem) throws java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException { this._itemList.add(index, vItem); } //-- void addItem(int, xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item) public java.util.Enumeration enumerateItem() { return java.util.Collections.enumeration(this._itemList); } //-- java.util.Enumeration enumerateItem() public xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item getItem(int index) throws java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException { // check bounds for index if (index < 0 || index >= this._itemList.size()) { throw new IndexOutOfBoundsException("getItem: Index value '" + index + "' not in range [0.." + (this._itemList.size() - 1) + "]"); } return (xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item) _itemList.get(index); } //-- xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item getItem(int) public xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item[] getItem() { int size = this._itemList.size(); xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item[] array = new xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item[size]; for (int index = 0; index < size; index++){ array[index] = (xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item) _itemList.get(index); } return array; } //-- xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item[] getItem() public int getItemCount() { return this._itemList.size(); } //-- int getItemCount() public java.util.Iterator iterateItem() { return this._itemList.iterator(); } //-- java.util.Iterator iterateItem() public void removeAllItem() { this._itemList.clear(); } //-- void removeAllItem() public boolean removeItem(xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item vItem) { boolean removed = _itemList.remove(vItem); return removed; } //-- boolean removeItem(xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item) public xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item removeItemAt(int index) { Object obj = this._itemList.remove(index); return (xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item) obj; } //-- xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item removeItemAt(int) public void setItem(int index, xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item vItem) throws java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException { // check bounds for index if (index < 0 || index >= this._itemList.size()) { throw new IndexOutOfBoundsException("setItem: Index value '" + index + "' not in range [0.." + (this._itemList.size() - 1) + "]"); } this._itemList.set(index, vItem); } //-- void setItem(int, xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item) public void setItem(xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item[] vItemArray) { //-- copy array _itemList.clear(); for (int i = 0; i < vItemArray.length; i++) { this._itemList.add(vItemArray[i]); } } //-- void setItem(xml.c1677.invoice.generated.Item) }
Two companies wish to trade with each other using a Supply Chain messaging system. This system sends and receives Purchase Orders and Order Receipt messages. After many months of discussion they have finally decided upon the structure of the Version 1.0 of their message XSD and both are presently developing solutions for it. One of the companies decides to use Java and Castor XML support for (un)marshaling and Castor's code generator to accelerate their development process.
<title>supplyChainV1.0.xsd</title> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> <xs:element name="Data"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> This section contains the supply chain message data </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:complexType> <xs:choice> <xs:element name="PurchaseOrder"> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="LineItem" type="LineItemType" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:attribute name="OrderNumber" type="xs:string" use="required"/> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:element name="OrderReceipt"> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="LineItem" type="ReceiptLineItemType" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:attribute name="OrderNumber" type="xs:string" use="required"/> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> </xs:choice> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:complexType name="SkuType"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation>Contains Product Identifier</xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="Number" type="xs:integer"/> <xs:element name="ID" type="xs:string"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="ReceiptSkuType"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation>Contains Product Identifier</xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:complexContent> <xs:extension base="SkuType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="InternalID" type="xs:string"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:extension> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="LineItemType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="Sku" type="SkuType"/> <xs:element name="Value" type="xs:double"/> <xs:element name="BillingInstructions" type="xs:string"/> <xs:element name="DeliveryDate" type="xs:date"/> <xs:element name="Number" type="xs:integer"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="ReceiptLineItemType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="Sku" type="ReceiptSkuType"/> <xs:element name="Value" type="xs:double"/> <xs:element name="PackingDescription" type="xs:string"/> <xs:element name="ShipDate" type="xs:dateTime"/> <xs:element name="Number" type="xs:integer"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:schema>
If you run the Castor CodeGenerator on the above XSD you end up with the following set of classes. (You also get lots of warning messages with the present version.)
Data.java DataDescriptor.java LineItem.java LineItemDescriptor.java LineItemType.java LineItemTypeDescriptor.java OrderReceipt.java OrderReceiptDescriptor.java PurchaseOrder.java PurchaseOrderDescriptor.java ReceiptLineItemType.java ReceiptLineItemTypeDescriptor.java ReceiptSkuType.java ReceiptSkuTypeDescriptor.java Sku.java SkuDescriptor.java SkuType.java SkuTypeDescriptor.java
The problem here is that there are two different elements with the same name in different locations in the XSD. This causes a Java code generation conflict. By default, Castor uses the element name as the name of the class. So the second class generated for the LineItem definition, which is different than the first, overwrites the first class generated.
A binding file is therefore necessary to help the Castor code generator differentiate between these generated classes and as such avoid such generation conflicts. That is, you can 'bind' an element in the XML schema to a differently named class file that you want to generate. This keeps different elements separate and ensures that source is properly generated for each XML Schema object.
Tip | |
---|---|
The warning messages for Castor 0.99+ are very useful in assisting you in your creation of the binding file. For the example the warning messages for the example are: Warning: A class name generation conflict has occurred between element '/Data/OrderReceipt/LineItem' and element '/Data/PurchaseOrder/LineItem'. Please use a Binding file to solve this problem.Continue anyway [not recommended] (y|n|?)y Warning: A class name generation conflict has occurred between element '/Data/OrderReceipt/LineItem' and element '/Data/PurchaseOrder/LineItem'. Please use a Binding file to solve this problem.Continue anyway [not recommended] (y|n|?)y Warning: A class name generation conflict has occurred between element '/Data/OrderReceipt/LineItem' and element '/Data/PurchaseOrder/LineItem'. Please use a Binding file to solve this problem.Continue anyway [not recommended] (y|n|?)y Warning: A class name generation conflict has occurred between element 'complexType:ReceiptLineItemType/Sku' and element 'complexType:LineItemType/Sku'. Please use a Binding file to solve this problem.Continue anyway [not recommended] (y|n|?)y Warning: A class name generation conflict has occurred between element 'complexType:ReceiptLineItemType/Sku' and element 'complexType:LineItemType/Sku'. Please use a Binding file to solve this problem.Continue anyway [not recommended] (y|n|?)y Warning: A class name generation conflict has occurred between element 'complexType:ReceiptLineItemType/Sku' and element 'complexType:LineItemType/Sku'. Please use a Binding file to solve this problem.Continue anyway [not recommended] (y|n|?)y |
The following binding file definition will overcome the naming issues for the generated classes:
<binding xmlns="http://www.castor.org/SourceGenerator/Binding" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.castor.org/SourceGenerator/Binding C:\\Castor\\xsd\\binding.xsd" defaultBinding="element"> <elementBinding name="/Data/PurchaseOrder/LineItem"> <java-class name="PurchaseOrderLineItem"/> </elementBinding> <elementBinding name="/Data/OrderReceipt/LineItem"> <java-class name="OrderReceiptLineItem"/> </elementBinding> <elementBinding name="/complexType:ReceiptLineItemType/Sku"> <java-class name="OrderReceiptSku"/> </elementBinding> <elementBinding name="/complexType:LineItemType/Sku"> <java-class name="PurchaseOrderSku"/> </elementBinding> </binding>
One thing to notice in the above binding.xml
file is that
the name path used is relative to the root of the XSD and not
the root of the target XML. Also notice that the two complex types
have the "complexType:" prefix to identify them followed by the name
path relative to the root of the XSD.
The new list of generated classes is:
Data.java DataDescriptor.java LineItem.java LineItemDescriptor.java LineItemType.java LineItemTypeDescriptor.java OrderReceipt.java OrderReceiptDescriptor.java OrderReceiptLineItem.java OrderReceiptLineItemDescriptor.java OrderReceiptSku.java OrderReceiptSkuDescriptor.java PurchaseOrder.java PurchaseOrderDescriptor.java PurchaseOrderLineItem.java PurchaseOrderLineItemDescriptor.java PurchaseOrderSku.java PurchaseOrderSkuDescriptor.java ReceiptLineItemType.java ReceiptLineItemTypeDescriptor.java ReceiptSkuType.java ReceiptSkuTypeDescriptor.java Sku.java SkuDescriptor.java SkuType.java SkuTypeDescriptor.java
The developers can now use these generated classes with Castor to (un)marshal the supply chain messages sent by their business partner.
With Castor 1.2 and previous releases it was already possible to generate Java classes from an XML schema and use these classes for XML data binding without having to write a mapping file.
This is possible because the Castor XML code generator generated - in addition to the domain classes - a set of XML descriptor classes as well, with one descriptor class generated per generated domain class. It's this XML descriptor class that holds all the information required to map Java classes and/or field members to XML artifacts, as set out in the original XML schema definitions. This includes ....
artefact names
XML namespace URIs
XML namespace prefix
validation code
In addition, it was already possible to use the generated set of domain classes in Castor JDO for object-/relational mapping purpose by supplying a (manually written) JDO-specific mapping file. Whilst technically not very difficult, this was still an error-prone task, especially in a context where tens or hundreds of classes were generated from a set of XML schemas.
The JDO extensions for the Castor XML code generator extend the code generator in such a way that a second set of descriptor classes is generated: the JDO descriptor classes. These new descriptor classes define the mapping between Java (domain) objects and database tables/columns, and as such remove the requirement of having to write a JDO-specific mapping file.
Note | |
---|---|
Please note that Castor JDO - upon startup - internally converts the information provided in the JDO mapping file to (JDO) descriptor classes. As such, the approach outlined above simply re-uses an existing code base and just automates the production of those descriptor classes. |
The following sections introduce the general principles, define the XML schema artifacts available to annotate an existing XML schema and highlight the usage of these artifacts by providing examples. At the same time, a limited set of current product limitations are spelled out.
With release 1.3 of Castor, the following limitations exist for the JDO extensions of the XML code generator:
The extensions currently can only be used in type mode of the XML code generator.
There's currently no support for key generators. There's work in progress to add this functionality, though.
There's currently no support for bidirectional relations, modelled through the use of <xs:id> and <xs:idref> constructs.
To facilitate the detailed explanations in the following sections, we now define a few <complexType> definitions that we want to map against an existing database schema, and the corresponding SQL statements to create the required tables.
<complexType name="bookType"> <sequence> <element name="isbn" type="xs:string" /> <element name="pages" type="xs:integer" /> <element name="lector" type="lectorType" /> <element name="authors" type="authorType" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> </sequence> </complexType> <complexType name="lectorType"> <sequence> <element name="siNumber" type="xs:integer" /> <element name="name" type="xs:string" /> </sequence> </complexType> <complexType name="authorType"> <sequence> <element name="siNumber" type="xs:integer" /> <element name="name" type="xs:string" /> </sequence> </complexType>
CREATE TABLE author_table ( sin INTEGER NOT NULL, name VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL ); CREATE TABLE lector_table ( sin INTEGER NOT NULL, name VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL ); CREATE TABLE book_table ( isbn VARCHAR(13) NOT NULL, pages INTEGER, lector_id INTEGER NOT NULL, author_id INTEGER NOT NULL );
To have the Castor XML code generator generate JDO class descriptors when processing a set of XML schemas, please use one of the following methods:
Table 3.1. Accessing options
Usage | Method | Description |
---|---|---|
SourceGenerator | setJdoDescriptorCreation(boolean) | Supply a value of true to enable this feature. |
SourceGeneratorMain | Flag -gen-jdo-desc | Set this optional flag to enable this feature. |
Ant task for XML code generator | generateJdoDescriptors option | Set this to a value of true . |
This section enlists the XML artifacts available to annotate an existing XML schema
with JDO extension-specific information. These constructs are defined themselves
in an XML schema jdo-extensions.xsd
that has a target
namespace of http://www.castor.org/binding/persistence
.
To enable proper validation of your XML schemas when editing JDO
annotations, and to enable XML completion in your preferred XML
editor, please add schemaLocation
information to
your XML schema definition as follows:
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" targetNamespace="http://your/target/namespace" xmlns:jdo="http://www.castor.org/binding/persistence" xmlns="http://your/target/namespace" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.castor.org/binding/persistence http://www.castor.org/jdo-extensions.xsd"> ... </xs:schema>
where ...
The values supplied in the |
The <table> element allows you to map an <complexType>
definition to a database table within a database, and to specify the
identity (frequently referred to as primary key
),
as follows:
<xs:complexType name="authorType"> <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo> <jdo:table name="author_table"> <jdo:primary-key> <jdo:key>siNumber</jdo:key> </jdo:primary-key> </jdo:table> </xs:appinfo> </xs:annotation> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="siNumber" type="xs:integer" /> <xs:element name="name" type="xs:string" /> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType>
where ...
The | |
The |
Above example maps the complex type authorType
to
the table author_table
, and specifies that the
member siNumber
be used as object identity.
The XML schema definition for the <table>
element is defined as follows:
<xs:element name="table"> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="primaryKey" type="jdo:pkType"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:attribute name="name" type="xs:string" use="required"/> <xs:attribute name="accessMode" use="optional" default="shared"> <xs:simpleType> <xs:restriction base="xs:string"> <xs:enumeration value="read-only"/> <xs:enumeration value="shared"/> <xs:enumeration value="exclusive"/> <xs:enumeration value="db-locked"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> </xs:attribute> <xs:attribute name="detachable" type="xs:boolean" default="false"/> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:complexType name="pkType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="key" type="xs:string" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType>
The <column> element allows you to map a member of content model of a <complexType> definition to a column within a database table.
<xs:complexType name="authorType"> <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo> <jdo:table name="author_table"> <jdo:primary-key> <jdo:key>siNumber</jdo:key> </jdo:primary-key> </jdo:table> </xs:appinfo> </xs:annotation> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="siNumber" type="xs:integer" > <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo> <jdo:column name="sin" type="integer" /> </xs:appinfo> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> <xs:element name="name" type="xs:string" /> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType>
where ....
Defines that the element definition |
Above example maps the element isNumber
to
the database column sin
, and specifies the database type
to be used for persistence (integer
, in this case).
The XML schema definition for <column>
is
defined as follows:
<xs:element name="column"> <xs:complexType> <xs:complexContent> <xs:extension base="jdo:readonlyDirtyType"> <xs:attribute name="name" type="xs:string" use="required" /> <xs:attribute name="type" type="xs:string" use="required" /> <xs:attribute name="acceptNull" type="xs:boolean" use="optional" default="true" /> </xs:extension> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:element>
where the content is described as follows:
Table 3.2. <column> - Definitions
Name | Description |
---|---|
name | Name of the column |
type | JDO-type of the column |
acceptNull | Whether this field accepts NULL values or not |
The <one-to-one> element allows you to map a member of content model of a <complexType> definition to a 1:1 relation to another <complexType>.
<xs:complexType name="bookType"> <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo> <jdo:table name="book_type_table"> <jdo:primary-key> <jdo:key>isbn</jdo:key> </jdo:primary-key> </jdo:table> </xs:appinfo> </xs:annotation> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="isbn" type="xs:string" > <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo> <jdo:column name="isbn" type="varchar" /> </xs:appinfo> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> <xs:element name="pages" type="xs:integer" > <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo> <jdo:column name="pages" type="integer" /> </xs:appinfo> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> <xs:element name="lector" type="lectorType" > <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo> <jdo:one-to-one name="lector_id" /> </xs:appinfo> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> <xs:element name="authors" type="authorType" maxOccurs="unbounded" > ... </xs:element> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType>
where ....
Defines a 1:1 relation to another <complexType>, additionally providing the necessary foreign key column at the database level. |
Above example maps the element lector
to a
1:1 relation to the complex type lectorType
, and
specifies the (column name of the) foreign key to be used
(lector_id
in this case).
The XML schema definition for <one-to-one>
is defined as follows:
<xs:element name="one-to-one"> <xs:complexType> <xs:complexContent> <xs:extension base="jdo:readonlyDirtyType"> <xs:attribute name="name" type="xs:string"/> </xs:extension> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:element>
where the content is described as follows:
Table 3.3. <one-to-one> - Definitions
Name | Description |
---|---|
name | Name of the column that represents the foreign key of this relation |
The <one-to-many> element allows you to map a member of the content model of a <complexType> definition as part of a 1:M relation to another <complexType>.
<xs:complexType name="bookType"> <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo> <jdo:table name="book_type_table"> <jdo:primary-key> <jdo:key>isbn</jdo:key> </jdo:primary-key> </jdo:table> </xs:appinfo> </xs:annotation> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="isbn" type="xs:string" > <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo> <jdo:column name="isbn" type="varchar" /> </xs:appinfo> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> <xs:element name="pages" type="xs:integer" > <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo> <jdo:column name="pages" type="integer" /> </xs:appinfo> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> <xs:element name="lector" type="lectorType" > <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo> <jdo:one-to-one name="lector_id" /> </xs:appinfo> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> <xs:element name="authors" type="authorType" maxOccurs="unbounded" > <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo> <jdo:one-to-many name="book_id" /> </xs:appinfo> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType>
where ....
Defines a 1:M relation to another <complexType>, additionally providing the necessary foreign key column for the many member at the database level. |
Above example maps the element authors
as part of a
1:M relation to the complex type authorType
, and
specifies the (column name of the) foreign key of the many member
to be used (book_id
in this case).
The XML schema definition for <one-to-many>
is given as follows:
<xs:element name="one-to-many"> <xs:complexType> <xs:complexContent> <xs:extension base="jdo:readonlyDirtyType"> <xs:attribute name="name" type="xs:string" /> </xs:extension> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:element>
with the following details applying:
Table 3.4. <one-to-many> - Definitions
Name | Description |
---|---|
name | Name of the column that represents the (many) foreign key of this relation |
Once you have generated domain classes and descriptor classes (both XML and JDO) from your set of XML schemas, you'll be able to use them as are. There's a few minor changes, which we are going to highlight below, but the main benefit is that you not have to write a JDO mapping file.
As you have already generated JDO descriptor classes for each of your domain objects, you won't have to supply mappings for those classes anymore. As such, your mapping file will stay empty, as shown:
<?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE mapping PUBLIC "-//EXOLAB/Castor Mapping DTD Version 1.0//EN" "http://castor.org/mapping.dtd"> <mapping> <!-- no mappings required --> </mapping>
Note | |
---|---|
Please note that you can of course supply mappings for those classes that stand outside of the generation process from your XML schemas. It is possible, too, to match both modes. In other words, a domain class mapped manually will be able to refer to a domain class as generated. |
In order for Castor to be able to access the generated (JDO) class
descriptors and to load those classes from the file system,
you will have to configure an instance of
JDOClassDescriptorResolver
and pass it to your
JDOManager
instance when loading the JDO
configuration.
The following example shows how to configure Castor JDO so that the classes generated from the sample XML schema above can be used with CASTOR JDO seamlessly.
JDOClassDescriptorResolver resolver = new JDOClassDescriptorResolverImpl(); resolver.addClass(org.castor.jdo.extension.sample.BookType.class); resolver.addClass(org.castor.jdo.extension.sample.LectorType.class); resolver.addClass(org.castor.jdo.extension.sample.AuthorType.class); InputSource jdoConfiguration = ....; JDOManager.loadConfiguration(jdoConfiguration, null, null, resolver); JDOManager jdoManager = JDOManager.createInstance("jdo-extensions"); ...
Alternatively, if the classes generated from the sample
XML schema shown above reside in the same package, you can
configure the JDOClassDescriptorResolver
as follows:
JDOClassDescriptorResolver resolver = new JDOClassDescriptorResolverImpl(); resolver.addPackage("org.castor.jdo.extension.sample"); ...
Tip | |
---|---|
For the latter approach to work, you will have to make sure that the
|
In order to start using the Spring ORM module for Castor JDO, you will have to have Maven 2 installed:
Download and install Maven 2
As this project uses Maven 2 for build and deployment, all required compile-time and run-time dependencies will automatically be resolved by Maven 2 and deployed into your local Maven 2 repository.
Please add the following Maven dependency to your POM to include the Spring ORM package for Castor JDO with your project:
<dependency> <groupId>org.codehaus.castor</groupId> <artifactId>spring-orm</artifactId> <version>1.3</version> </dependency>
If you create a dependency against a SNAPSHOT release, you will
have to add the following <repository>
element
to your POM as well, so that Maven 2 knows about the
Codehaus Snapshot repository when
trying to resolve and download dependencies.
<repository> <id>codehaus-snapshots</id> <name>Maven Codehaus Snapshots</name> <url>http://snapshots.maven.codehaus.org/maven2/</url> </repository>>
This guide assumes that you are an experienced Castor JDO users that knows how to use Castor's interfaces and classes to interact with a database. If this is not the case, please familiarize yourself with Castor JDO first.
The sample domain objects used in here basically define a Catalogue
,
which is a collection of Product
s. A possible castor JDO mapping could look
as follows:
<class name="org.castor.sample.Catalogue"> <map-to table="catalogue"/> <field name="id" type="long"> <sql name="id" type="integer" /> </field> <field name="products" type="org.castor.sample.Product" collection="arraylist"> <sql many-key="c_id" /> </field> </class> <class name="org.castor.sample.Product"> <map-to table="product"/> <field name="id" type="long"> <sql name="id" type="integer" /> </field> <field name="description" type="string"> <sql name="desc" type="varchar" /> </field> </class>
To e.g. load a given Catalogue
instance as defined by its identity,
and all its associated Product
instances, the following code could be used,
based upon the Castor-specific interfaces JDOManager
and Database
.
JDOManager.loadConfiguration("jdo-conf.xml"); JDOManager jdoManager = JDOmanager.createInstance("sample"); Database database = jdoManager.getDatabase(); database.begin(); Catalogue catalogue = database.load(catalogue.class, new Long(1)); database.commit(); database.close();
For brevity, exception handling has been omitted completely. But is is quite obvious that - when using such code fragments to implement various methods of a DAO - there's a lot of redundant code that needed to be written again and again - and exception handling is adding some additional complexity here as well.
Enters Spring ORM for Castor JDO, a small layer that allows usage of Castor JDO through Spring ORM, with all the known benefits (exception conversion, templates, tx handling).
Let's see how one might implement the loadProduct(int)
of a
ProductDAO
class with the help of Spring ORM using Castor
JDO:
public class ProductDaoImpl implements ProductDao { private JDOManager jdoManager; public void setJDOManager(JDOManager jdoManager) { this.jdoManager = jdoManager; } public Product loadProduct(final int id) { CastorTemplate tempate = new CastorTemplate(this.jdoManager); return (Product) template.execute( new CastorCallback() { public Object doInJdo(Database database) throws PersistenceException { return (Product) database.load(Product.class, new Integer (id)); } }); } }
Still a lot of code to write, but compared to the above section, the DAO gets
passed a fully configured JDOManager
instance through Spring's dependency
injection mechanism. All that's required is configuration of Castor's JDOManager
as a Spring bean definition in an Spring application context as
follows.
<bean id="jdoManager" class="org.castor.spring.orm.LocalCastorFactoryBean"> <property name="databaseName" value="test" /> <property name="configLocation" value="classpath:jdo-conf.xml" /> </bean> <bean id="myProductDao" class="product.ProductDaoImpl"> <property name="JDOManager"> <ref bean="jdoManager"/> </property> </bean>
Above code is still quite verbose, as it requires you to write short
(though complex) callback functions. To ease life of the Castor JDO
user even more, a range of template methods have been added to
CastorTemplate
, allowing the implementation of
above ProductDAO
to be shortened considerably.
public class ProductDaoImplUsingTemplate extends CastorTemplate implements ProductDao { private JDOManager jdoManager; public void setJDOManager(JDOManager jdoManager) { this.jdoManager = jdoManager; } public Product loadProduct(final int id) { return (Product) load(Integer.valueOf(id)); } ... }
Changing the bean definition for myProductDAO
to ...
<bean id="myProductDao" class="product.ProductDaoImplUsingTemplate"> <property name="JDOManager"> <ref bean="myJdoManager"/> </property> </bean>
loading an instance of Product
by its identifier
is reduced to ...
ProductDao dao = (ProductDAO) context.getBean ("myProductDAO");
Product product = dao.load(1);
Alternatively to extending CastorTemplate
, one could extend the
CastorDaoSupport
class and implement the
ProductDAO
as
follows.
public class ProductDaoImplUsingDaoSupport extends CastorDaoSupport implements ProductDao { private JDOManager jdoManager; public void setJDOManager(JDOManager jdoManager) { this.jdoManager = jdoManager; } public Product loadProduct(final int id) { return (Product) getCastorTemplate().load(Integer.valueOf(id)); } ... }
Changing the bean definition for myProductDAO
to ...
<bean id="myProductDao" class="product.ProductDaoImplUsingDaoSupport"> <property name="JDOManager"> <ref bean="myJdoManager"/> </property> </bean>
the code to load an instance of Product
still
is as shown above.
We will start with a coverage of Hibernate in a Spring environment, using it to demonstrate the approach that Spring takes towards integrating O/R mappers. This section will cover many issues in detail and show different variations of DAO implementations and transaction demarcations.
Typical business applications are often cluttered with repetitive resource management code. Many projects try to invent their own solutions for this issue, sometimes sacrificing proper handling of failures for programming convenience. Spring advocates strikingly simple solutions for proper resource handling, namely IoC via templating; for example infrastructure classes with callback interfaces, or applying AOP interceptors. The infrastructure cares for proper resource handling, and for appropriate conversion of specific API exceptions to an unchecked infrastructure exception hierarchy. Spring introduces a DAO exception hierarchy, applicable to any data access strategy. For direct JDBC, the JdbcTemplate class mentioned in a previous section cares for connection handling, and for proper conversion of SQLException to the DataAccessException hierarchy, including translation of database-specific SQL error codes to meaningful exception classes. It supports both JTA and JDBC transactions, via respective Spring transaction managers.
This module implements Spring ORM/DAO support for Castor JDO, consisting of a CastorTemplate analogous to JdbcTemplate, a CastorInterceptor, and a Castor transaction manager. The major goal is to allow for clear application layering, with any data access and transaction technology, and for loose coupling of application objects. No more business service dependencies on the data access or transaction strategy, no more hard-coded resource lookups, no more hard-to-replace singletons, no more custom service registries. One simple and consistent approach to wiring up application objects, keeping them as reusable and free from container dependencies as possible. All the individual data access features are usable on their own but integrate nicely with Spring's application context concept, providing XML-based configuration and cross-referencing of plain JavaBean instances that don't need to be Spring-aware. In a typical Spring app, many important objects are JavaBeans: data access templates, data access objects (that use the templates), transaction managers, business services (that use the data access objects and transaction managers), web view resolvers, web controllers (that use the business services), and so on.
To avoid tying application objects to hard-coded resource lookups, Spring allows you to define resources like a JDBC DataSource or a Castor JDOManager as beans in an application context. Application objects that need to access resources just receive references to such pre-defined instances via bean references (the DAO definition in the next section illustrates this). The following excerpt from an XML application context definition shows how to set up a JDBC DataSource and a Castor JDOManager on top of it:
<beans> <bean id="myDataSource" class="org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource" destroy-method="close"> <property name="driverClassName" value="org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver" /> <property name="url" value="jdbc:hsqldb:hsql://localhost:9001" /> <property name="username" value="sa" /> <property name="password" value="" /> </bean> <bean id="myJDOManager" class="org.castor.spring.orm.LocalCastorFactoryBean"> <property name="databaseName" value="test" /> <property name="configLocation" value="classpath:jdo-conf.xml" /> </bean> </beans>
Note that switching from a local Jakarta Commons DBCP BasicDataSource to a JNDI-located DataSource (usually managed by an application server) is just a matter of configuration:
<beans> <bean id="myDataSource" class="org.springframework.jndi.JndiObjectFactoryBean"> <property name="jndiName" value="java:comp/env/jdbc/myds" /> </bean> </beans>
You can also access a JNDI-located SessionFactory, using Spring's JndiObjectFactoryBean to retrieve and expose it. However, that is typically not common outside of an EJB context.
The basic programming model for templating looks as follows, for methods that can be part of any custom data access object or business service. There are no restrictions on the implementation of the surrounding object at all, it just needs to provide a Castor JDOManager. It can get the latter from anywhere, but preferably as bean reference from a Spring application context - via a simple setJDOManager(..) bean property setter. The following snippets show a DAO definition in a Spring container, referencing the above defined JDOManager, and an example for a DAO method implementation.
<beans> <bean id="myProductDao" class="org.exolab.castor.dao.ProductDaoImpl"> <property name="JDOManager"><ref bean="jdoManager"/></property> </bean> </beans>
public class ProductDaoImpl implements ProductDao { private Castor castorTemplate; public void setJDOManager(JDOManager jdoManager) { this.castorTemplate = new CastorTemplate(jdoManager); } public Collection loadProductsByCategory(final String category) throws DataAccessException { return (Collection) this.castorTemplate.execute( new CastorCallback() { public Object doInCastor(Database database) throws PersistenceException { database.begin(); OQLQuery query = database.getOQL("select p from org.exolab.castor.dao.ProductDao p " + " where p.category = ?"); query.bind(category); QueryResults results = query.execute(); database.commit(); return Collections.list(); } ); } }
A callback implementation can effectively be used for any Castor data access. CastorTemplate will ensure that Database instances are properly opened and closed, and automatically participate in transactions. The template instances are thread-safe and reusable, they can thus be kept as instance variables of the surrounding class.
For simple single step actions like a single find, load, saveOrUpdate, or delete call, CastorTemplate offers alternative convenience methods that can replace such one line callback implementations. Furthermore, Spring provides a convenient CastorDaoSupport base class that provides a setJDOManager(..) method for receiving a JDOManager, and getJDOManager() and getCastorTemplate()for use by subclasses.
In combination, this allows for very simple DAO implementations for typical requirements:
public class ProductDaoImpl extends HibernateDaoSupport implements ProductDao { public Collection loadProductsByCategory(String category) throws DataAccessException { return this.getCastorTemplate().find("select p from test.Product product where p.category=?", category); } }
As alternative to using Spring's CastorTemplate to implement DAOs, data access code can also be written in a more traditional fashion, without wrapping the Hibernate access code in a callback, while still complying to Spring's generic DataAccessException hierarchy. Spring's CastorDaoSupport base class offers methods to access the current transactional Database and to convert exceptions in such a scenario; similar methods are also available as static helpers on the JDOManagerUtils class. Note that such code will usually pass "false" into the getDatabased(..) method's "allowCreate" argument, to enforce running within a transaction (which avoids the need to close the returned Database, as it's lifecycle is managed by the transaction).
public class ProductDaoImpl extends HibernateDaoSupport implements ProductDao { public Collection loadProductsByCategory(String category) throws DataAccessException, MyException { Database database = getDatabase(getJDOManager(), false); try { List result = database.find( "select p from test.Product p where " + " product.category=?", category, Castor.STRING); if (result == null) { throw new MyException("invalid search result"); } return result; } catch (PersistenceException ex) { throw convertCastorAccessException(ex); } } }
The major advantage of such direct Castor JDO access code is that it allows any checked application exception to be thrown within the data access code, while CastorTemplate is restricted to unchecked exceptions within the callback. Note that one can often defer the corresponding checks and the throwing of application exceptions to after the callback, which still allows working with CastorTemplate. In general, the CastorTemplate class' convenience methods are simpler and more convenient for many scenarios.
Transactions can be demarcated in a higher level of the application, on top of such lower-level data access services spanning any number of operations. There are no restrictions on the implementation of the surrounding business service here as well, it just needs a Spring PlatformTransactionManager. Again, the latter can come from anywhere, but preferably as bean reference via a setTransactionManager(..) method - just like the productDAO should be set via a setProductDao(..) method.
The following snippets show a transaction manager and a business service definition in a Spring application context, and an example for a business method implementation.
<beans> <bean id="myTxManager" class="org.castor.spring.orm.CastorTransactionManager"> <property name="jdoManager" ref="myJDOManager" /> </bean> <bean id="myProductService" class="product.ProductServiceImpl"> <property name="transactionManager" ref="myTxManager" /> <property name="productDao" ref="myProductDao" /> </bean> </beans>
public class ProductServiceImpl implements ProductService { private TransactionTemplate transactionTemplate; private ProductDao productDao; public void setTransactionManager(PlatformTransactionManager transactionManager) { this.transactionTemplate = new TransactionTemplate(transactionManager); } public void setProductDao(ProductDao productDao) { this.productDao = productDao; } public void increasePriceOfAllProductsInCategory(final String category) { this.transactionTemplate.execute( new TransactionCallbackWithoutResult() { public void doInTransactionWithoutResult(TransactionStatus status) { List productsToChange = productDAO.loadProductsByCategory(category); // do the price increase... } } ); } }
Alternatively, one can use Spring's declarative transaction support, which essentially enables you to replace explicit transaction demarcation API calls in your Java code with an AOP transaction interceptor configured in a Spring container. This allows you to keep business services free of repetitive transaction demarcation code, and allows you to focus on adding business logic which is where the real value of your application lies. Furthermore, transaction semantics like propagation behavior and isolation level can be changed in a configuration file and do not affect the business service implementations.
<beans> <bean id="myTxManager" class="org.castor.spring.orm.CastorTransactionManager"> <property name="jdoManager" ref="myJDOManager" /> </bean> <bean id="myProductService" class="org.springframework.aop.framework.ProxyFactoryBean"> <property name="proxyInterfaces" value="product.ProductService" /> <property name="target"> <bean class="product.DefaultProductService"> <property name="productDao" ref="myProductDao" /> </bean> </property> <property name="interceptorNames"> <list> <value>myTxInterceptor</value><!-- the transaction interceptor (configured elsewhere) --> </list> </property> </bean> </beans>
public class ProductServiceImpl implements ProductService { private ProductDao productDao; public void setProductDao(ProductDao productDao) { this.productDao = productDao; } // notice the absence of transaction demarcation code in this method // Spring's declarative transaction infrastructure will be demarcating //transactions on your behalf public void increasePriceOfAllProductsInCategory(final String category) { List productsToChange = this.productDAO.loadProductsByCategory(category); // ... } }
Spring's TransactionInterceptor allows any checked application exception to be thrown with the callback code, while TransactionTemplate is restricted to unchecked exceptions within the callback. TransactionTemplate will trigger a rollback in case of an unchecked application exception, or if the transaction has been marked rollback-only by the application (via TransactionStatus). TransactionInterceptor behaves the same way by default but allows configurable rollback policies per method.
The following higher level approach to declarative transactions doesn't use the ProxyFactoryBean, and as such may be easier to use if you have a large number of service objects that you wish to make transactional.
Note | |
---|---|
You are strongly encouraged to read the section entitled Section 9.5, “Declarative transaction management” if you have not done so already prior to continuing. |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:aop="http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop" xmlns:tx="http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx" xsi:schemaLocation=" http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx/spring-tx-2.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop/spring-aop-2.0.xsd"> <!-- JDOManager, DataSource, etc. omitted --> <bean id="myTxManager" class="org.castor.spring.orm.CastorTransactionManager"> <property name="jdoManager" ref="myJDOManager" /> </bean> <aop:config> <aop:pointcut id="productServiceMethods" expression="execution(* product.ProductService.*(..))" /> <aop:advisor advice-ref="txAdvice" pointcut-ref="productServiceMethods" /> </aop:config> <tx:advice id="txAdvice" transaction-manager="myTxManager"> <tx:attributes> <tx:method name="increasePrice*" propagation="REQUIRED" /> <tx:method name="someOtherBusinessMethod" propagation="REQUIRES_NEW" /> <tx:method name="*" propagation="SUPPORTS" read-only="true" /> </tx:attributes> </tx:advice> <bean id="myProductService" class="product.SimpleProductService"> <property name="productDao" ref="myProductDao" /> </bean> </beans>
Both TransactionTemplate and TransactionInterceptor delegate the actual transaction handling to a PlatformTransactionManager instance, which can be a CastorTransactionManager (for a single Castor JDOManager, using a ThreadLocal Database under the hood) or a JtaTransactionManager (delegating to the JTA subsystem of the container) for Castor applications. You could even use a custom PlatformTransactionManager implementation. So switching from native Castor transaction management to JTA, such as when facing distributed transaction requirements for certain deployments of your application, is just a matter of configuration. Simply replace the Castor transaction manager with Spring's JTA transaction implementation. Both transaction demarcation and data access code will work without changes, as they just use the generic transaction management APIs.
For distributed transactions across multiple Castor JDOManager instances, simply combine JtaTransactionManager as a transaction strategy with multiple LocalCastorFactoryBean definitions. Each of your DAOs then gets one specific JDOManager reference passed into it's respective bean property. If all underlying JDBC data sources are transactional container ones, a business service can demarcate transactions across any number of DAOs and any number of session factories without special regard, as long as it is using JtaTransactionManager as the strategy.
<beans> <bean id="myDataSource1" class="org.springframework.jndi.JndiObjectFactoryBean"> <property name="jndiName value=" java:comp/env/jdbc/myds1" /> </bean> <bean id="myDataSource2" class="org.springframework.jndi.JndiObjectFactoryBean"> <property name="jndiName" value="java:comp/env/jdbc/myds2" /> </bean> <bean id="myJDOManager1" class="org.castor.spring.orm.LocalCastorFactoryBean"> <property name="databaseName" value="test1" /> <property name="configLocation" value="classpath:jdo-conf-1.xml" /> </bean> <bean id="myJDOManager2" class="org.castor.spring.orm.LocalCastorFactoryBean"> <property name="databaseName" value="test2" /> <property name="configLocation" value="classpath:jdo-conf-2.xml" /> </bean> <bean id="myTxManager" class="org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager" /> <bean id="myProductDao" class="product.ProductDaoImpl"> <property name="jdoManager" ref="myJDOManager1" /> </bean> <bean id="myInventoryDao" class="product.InventoryDaoImpl"> <property name="jdoManager" ref="myJDOManager2" /> </bean> <!-- this shows the Spring 1.x style of declarative transaction configuration --> <!-- it is totally supported, 100% legal in Spring 2.x, but see also above for the sleeker, Spring 2.0 style --> <bean id="myProductService" class="org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionProxyFactoryBean"> <property name="transactionManager" ref="myTxManager" /> <property name="target"> <bean class="product.ProductServiceImpl"> <property name="productDao" ref="myProductDao" /> <property name="inventoryDao" ref="myInventoryDao" /> </bean> </property> <property name="transactionAttributes"> <props> <prop key="increasePrice*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED</prop> <prop key="someOtherBusinessMethod"> PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW </prop> <prop key="*">PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS,readOnly</prop> </props> </property> </bean> </beans>
Both CastorTransactionManager and JtaTransactionManager allow for proper JVM-level cache handling with Castor - without container-specific transaction manager lookup or JCA connector (as long as not using EJB to initiate transactions).
CastorTransactionManager can export the JDBC Connection used by Castor to plain JDBC access code, for a specific DataSource. This allows for high-level transaction demarcation with mixed Castor/JDBC data access completely without JTA, as long as you are just accessing one database! CastorTransactionManager will automatically expose the Castor transaction as JDBC transaction if the passed-in JDOManager has been set up with a DataSource (through the "dataSource" property of the LocalCastorFactoryBean class).
Alternatively, the DataSource that the transactions are supposed to be exposed for can also be specified explicitly, through the "dataSource" property of the CastorTransactionManager class.
In order to build the Sping ORM module for Castor JDO, you will have the following requirements met on your system:
Download and install Maven 2
Download and install a Subversion client.
As this project uses Maven 2 for build and deployment, all required compile-time dependencies will automatically be resolved by Maven 2 and deployed into your local Maven 2 repository.
This section describes how to build the Spring module from a command line using Maven 2. Whilst there is support for Maven 2 in various IDEs (including e.g. Eclipse, IDEA, etc.), using the Maven command line seems to be the most adequate least common denominator.
This section assumes that you have ckecked out the latest sources from the SVN repsitory for the Spring ORM module for Castor JDO. Instructions for doing so are provided here.
Open a command line (shell) on your system, and issue the following commands:
> mvn jar
Above command will compile the sources and create the distribution JAR
in the target
directory of the project root.
To install the newly created distribution JAR into your local Maven 2 repository, please issue the following command:
> mvn install
To create the complete project documentation - in addition to the distribution assembly, please issue ...
> mvn site
It has always been a goal of the Castor JDO project to eventually fully support the JPA specification and become a first class JPA provider that can e.g. be easily integrated with Spring ORM. Whilst full compliance is still work in progress, there are several small areas where sufficient progress has been made, and where partial support will be made available to the user community.
One such area is (partial) support for JPA annotations. This chapter highlights how JPA-annotated Java classes can be used with Castor JDO to persist such classes through the existing persistence framework part of Castor, without little additional requirements.
The following sections describe ...
The prerequisites.
The current limitations.
The supported JPA annotations.
How to use Castor JDO to persist JPA-annotated classes.
How to use Castor JDO as Spring ORM provider to persist JPA-annotated classes.
The following sections assume that you have a (set of) JPA-annotated domain classes which you would like to persist using Castor JDO.
As such, we explain how to enlist those classes with
Castor JDO (through the JDOClassDescriptorResolver
interface, so that Castor JDO will be able to find and work with your
JPA-annotated classes. In addition, we explain how to achieve the same
with Spring ORM and the Spring ORM provider for Castor JDO.
By the end of this chapter is should become obvious that Castor JDO is well-prepared to integrate with the annotation part of the JPA specification, although support for JPA annotations is currently limited.
In Castor JPA there is no use or support for a JPA
persistence.xml
configuration file for
now. All required configuration needs to be supplied by one
of the following means:
Castor JDO configuration file.
JDOClassDescriptorResolver
configuration.
Spring configuration file for the Spring ORM provider for Castor JDO.
Because Castor does not support direct field access, this feature is not supported by Castor JPA. Thus all annotations have to be defined on the getter methods of the fields. If JPA related annotations are found on fields, Castor will throw an exception.
Primary keys made of single fields are supported by Castor as defined
in the JPA specification (through the use of the @Id
annotation). If
you need to define composite primary keys, please note that that
Castor does not support relations
with composite primary keys.
If you still want to persist single classes with the use of
composite primary keys, none of the available JPA annotations
(@EmbeddedId
or @IdClass
) is supported as such. Instead Castor
uses a kind of ad-hoc IdClass
mechanism. Simply
define multiple @Id
annotations on the fields that make up your
composite primary key, and Castor JDO will internally create the
relevant constructs.
These JPA annotations are currently not supported by Castor JDO. For now, you can only define entities.
S ... Supported |
PS ... Partially Supported |
NS ... Not Supported |
Table 5.1. JPA-Annotations
Annotation | Supported | Comment |
---|---|---|
AssociationOverride | NS | |
AssociationOverrides | NS | |
AttributeOverride | NS | |
AttributeOverrides | NS | |
Basic | S | See information on Castor fetch types! |
Column | PS | Supported: column name, nullable |
ColumnResult | NS | |
DiscriminatorColumn | NS | Castor does not support Joined Table Class Hierachy. |
DiscriminatorValue | NS | Castor does not support Joined Table Class Hierachy. |
Embeddable | NS | |
Embedded | NS | |
EmbeddedId | NS | Castor does not support composed primary keys embedded in classes of their own. |
Entity | S | This annotation is needed to tell Castor that this Class is an entity. |
EntityListeners | NS | |
EntityResult | NS | |
Enumerated | NS | |
ExcludeDefaultListeners | NS | |
ExcludeSuperclassListeners | NS | |
FieldResult | NS | |
GeneratedValue | NS | |
Id | S | Use this annotation to make a field a primary key (or part of it). |
IdClass | NS | Castor creates IdClass-like behaviour implicity when you define multiple Id fields. Castor does not support composed primary keys in relations! |
Inheritance | NS | |
JoinColumn | PS | Supported: name |
JoinColumns | NS | This is not supported because Castor does not support composed keys in relations. |
JoinTable | PS | Supported: name, joincolumns, inverseJoincolumns |
Lob | NS | |
ManyToMany | PS | this is not tested properly yet. |
ManyToOne | PS | Supported: targetEntity, fetch, optional - Relations MUST BE optional! Required relations are not supported. |
MapKey | NS | |
MappedSuperclass | NS | |
NamedNativeQueries | NS | |
NamedNativeQuery | NS | |
NamedQueries | NS | |
NamedQuery | NS | |
OneToMany | PS | Supported: targetEntity, fetch, mappedBy |
OneToOne | PS | Supported: targetEntity, fetch, optional - Relations MUST BE optional! Required relations are not supported. |
OrderBy | NS | |
PersistenceContext | NS | |
PersistenceContexts | NS | |
PersistenceProperty | NS | |
PersistenceUnit | NS | |
PersistenceUnits | NS | |
PostLoad | NS | |
PostPersist | NS | |
PostRemove | NS | |
PostUpdate | NS | |
PrePersist | NS | |
PreRemove | NS | |
PreUpdate | NS | |
PrimaryKeyJoinColumn | NS | |
PrimaryKeyJoinColumns | NS | |
QueryHint | NS | |
SecondaryTable | NS | |
SecondaryTables | NS | |
SequenceGenerator | NS | |
SqlResultSetMapping | NS | |
SqlResultSetMappings | NS | |
Table | PS | Supported: name |
TableGenerator | NS | |
Temporal | NS | |
Transient | S | |
UniqueConstraint | NS | |
Version | NS |
This selection of HOW-TOs will show you how to persist JPA-annotated classes with Castor JDO, and will outline the required steps for each of the following cases:
Singular (stand-alone) entities
1:1 relations
1:M relations
M:N relations
The goal is to take an existing JPA-annotated class
Single
and persist it with
Castor JDO. Let's first have a look at the domain class
itself, first without JPA annotattions.
public class Single { private int id; private String name; public int getId() { ... } public void setId(int id ) { ... } public String getName() { ... } public void setName(String name) { ... } }
Here's the same class again, this time with JPA annotations.
@Entity @Table(name="mySingleTable") public class Single { private int id; private String name; @Id @Column(name="id") public int getId() { ... } public void setId(int id) { ... } public String getName() { ... } public void setName(String name) { ... } }
As shown, the class Single
is
mapped against the table mySingleTable
,
and its fields id
and name
are mapped to the columns id
and
name
, where the column name for the
id
property is supplied explicitly and
where the column name for the name
property is derived from the property itself.
Next point is to create an DAO interface and
its implementation where we will be using
CastorDaoSupport
from Castor's
support for Spring ORM to implement the required methods.
public interface SingleDao { void save(Single single); Single get(int id); void delete(Single single); } public class SingleCastorDao extends CastorDaoSupport implements SingleDao { public void delete(Single single) { this.getCastorTemplate().remove(single); } public Single get(int id) { return (Single) this.getCastorTemplate().load(Single.class, new Integer(id)); } public void save(Single single) { this.getCastorTemplate().create(single); } }
There's one small final code change needed: For Castor to be able to work
with JPA-annotated classes, you have to configure an instance of
JDOClassDescriptorResolver
and pass
it to your JDOManager
, else Castor
won't be able to see those class files. Simply add
the individual classes one by one or the package(s)
as shown below:
JDOClassDescriptorResolver resolver = new JDOClassDescriptorResolverImpl(); resolver.addClass(org.castor.jpa.Single.class); // or alternatively you can add the package: resolver.addPackage("org.castor.jpa"); InputSource jdoConfiguration = ...; JDOManager.loadConfiguration(jdoConfiguration, null, null, resolver); JDOManager jdoManager = JDOManager.createInstance("jpa-extensions"); ...
The goal is to take the existing JPA-annotated classes
OneToOne_A
and OneToOne_B
and persist them with Castor JDO. Let's first have a look
at the domain classes themselves, this time with JPA
annotations already in place.
@Entity public class OneToOne_A { private int id; private String title; @Id @Column(name = "id") public int getId() { ... } public void setId(int id) { ... } @Column(name = "name") public String getTitle() { ... } public void setTitle(String title) { ... } } @Entity @Table(name="OneToOne_B") public class B { private int id; private String name; private OneToOne_A objA; @Id @Column(name = "id") public int getId() { ... } public void setId(int id) { ... } @Column(name = "name") public String getName() { ... } public void setName(String name) { ... } @OneToOne(optional=false) public OneToOne_A getOneToOne_A() { ... } public void setOneToOne_a(OneToOne_A objA) { ... } }
As shown, the class OneToOne_A
is
mapped against the table OneToOne_A
(implicit mapping), and the B
against the table OneToOne-B
(explicit
mapping). Please note the @OneToOne
annotation
that specifies the 1:1 relation from class
B
to class
OneToOne_A
.
As with the example shown further above, do not forget to
register all classes involved with the
JDOClassDescriptorResolver
as shown below:
JDOClassDescriptorResolver fragment:
resolver.addClass(org.castor.jpa.OneToOne_A.class); resolver.addClass(org.castor.jpa.B.class);
or with the addPackage
method:
resolver.addPackage("org.castor.jpa");
First we have to annotate our java classes.
@Entity @Table(name="OneToMany_actor") public class Actor { private int svnr; private String lastname; private String firstname; @Id public int getSvnr() { ... } public void setSvnr(int svnr) { ... } @Column(name="surname") public String getLastname() { ... } public void setLastname(String lastname) { ... } @Column(name="firstname") public String getFirstname() { ... } public void setFirstname(String firstname) { ... } } @Entity @Table(name="OneToMany_broadcast") public class Broadcast { private int id; private String name; private Collection<Actor> actors; @Id public int getId() { ... } public void setId(int id) { ... } public String getName() { ... } public void setName(String name) { ... } @OneToMany(targetEntity=Actor.class, mappedBy="actor_id") public Collection<Actor> getActors() { ... } public void setActors(Collection<Actor> actors) { ... } }
What you see is that with the small modification you can persist one to many relations easily.
Last don't forget to change your JDOClassDescriptorResolver accordingly.
This guide will show you how to enable the use of JPA annotations with Castor JDO in the context of Spring, Spring ORM and the existing Spring ORM support for Castor JDO.
Let's look at a typical Spring configuration file that shows how to use Castor JDO with Spring as a Spring ORM provider.
spring-config.xml
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:tx="http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx/spring-tx-2.5.xsd"> <!-- Enable transaction support using Annotations --> <tx:annotation-driven transaction-manager="transactionManager" /> <bean id="transactionManager" class="org.castor.spring.orm.CastorTransactionManager"> <property name="JDOManager" ref="jdoManager" /> </bean> <bean id="jdoManager" class="org.castor.spring.orm.LocalCastorFactoryBean"> <property name="databaseName" value="dbName" /> <property name="configLocation" value="jdo-conf.xml" /> </bean> <bean id="singleDao" class="SingleCastorDao"> <property name="JDOManager"> <ref bean="jdoManager"/> </property> </bean> </beans>
Above Spring application context configures the following Spring beans:
A factory bean for JDOManager instantiation
A Castor-specific transaction manager.
The DAO implementation as shown above.
As shown above, the bean definition for the
JDOManager
factory bean points to
a Castor JDO configuration file (jdo-conf.xml
),
whose content is shown below:
jdo-conf.xml
<!DOCTYPE jdo-conf PUBLIC "-//EXOLAB/Castor JDO Configuration DTD Version 1.0//EN""http://castor.org/jdo-conf.dtd"> <jdo-conf> <database name="dbName" engine="mysql"> <driver url="jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/single" class-name="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver"> <param name="user" value="user" /> <param name="password" value="password" /> </driver> <mapping href="mapping-empty.xml" /> </database> <transaction-demarcation mode="local" /> </jdo-conf>
More on how to configure the Spring ORM provider for Castor JDO can be found at TBD.
In order to use JPA-annotated classes with the Spring ORM provider
for Castor JDO, you will have to use and configure a
JDOClassDescriptorResolver
through an
additional bean definition and link it to your
JDOManager
bean factory definition.
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:tx="http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx/spring-tx-2.5.xsd"> ... <bean id="classDescriptorResolver" class="org.castor.spring.orm.ClassDescriptorResolverFactoryBean"> <property name="classes"> <list> <value>org.castor.jpa.test.Single</value> </list> </property> </bean> ... <bean id="jdoManager" class="org.castor.spring.orm.LocalCastorFactoryBean"> <property name="databaseName" value="dbName" /> <property name="configLocation" value="jdo-conf.xml" /> <property name="classDescriptorResolver" ref="classDescriptorResolver" /> </bean> ... </beans>
where ....
Defines a | |
links the |
If your domain classes share a set of packages, it is also
possible to enlist those packages with the
JDOClassDescriptorResolver
bean, replacing
the bean definition shown above as follows:
<bean id="classDescriptorResolver" class="org.castor.spring.orm.ClassDescriptorResolverFactoryBean"> <property name="packages"> <list> <value>org.castor.jpa.test</value> </list> </property> </bean>